Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
21–30 of 130 posts
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except all the outrage came from people who never lived in his buildings, and the ones who did gave it overwhelmingly great reviews.
The building has not yet been built.
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except all the outrage came from people who never lived in his buildings, and the ones who did gave it overwhelmingly great reviews.
The building has not yet been built.
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except all the outrage came from people who never lived in his buildings, and the ones who did gave it overwhelmingly great reviews.
The building has not yet been built.
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except all the outrage came from people who never lived in his buildings, and the ones who did gave it overwhelmingly great reviews.
The building has not yet been built.
[1]: https://www.veryapt.com/Apartments-L7646-ann-arbor-central-c...
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#26It took a second for me to make this connection, but the Charlie Munger in this article is the same Charlie Munger who designed that windowless dorm at UCSB that made the news a few days back. [0] I wonder if he applied the same principles to designing that building. [0] https://www.independent.com/2021/10/28/architect-resigns-in-...
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#27It took a second for me to make this connection, but the Charlie Munger in this article is the same Charlie Munger who designed that windowless dorm at UCSB that made the news a few days back. [0] I wonder if he applied the same principles to designing that building. [0] https://www.independent.com/2021/10/28/architect-resigns-in-...
Except it seems he forgot to invert the question of "How would I design an absolutely depressing and dangerous place to live?" then came up with that design.
Works for the Navy.
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except it seems he forgot to invert the question of "How would I design an absolutely depressing and dangerous place to live?" then came up with that design.
If we’re going to need people to populate austere environments lile Mars, we’re going to need people used to living without windows. Works for the Navy.
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except it seems he forgot to invert the question of "How would I design an absolutely depressing and dangerous place to live?" then came up with that design.
Except all the outrage came from people who never lived in his buildings, and the ones who did gave it overwhelmingly great reviews.
Re: Suppose I Wanted to Kill a Lot of Pilots (2020)
#30TRIZ practitioners quickly realized that the root cause of some problems cannot easily be identified, which makes a frontal assault on them impossible. This kind of problem is solved with TRIZ’s Anticipatory Failure Determination mental model — rather than solving for success, solve for failure. This is pretty darn close to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophatic_theology : I can't tell you what The Good Thing is, bu…
Disproving a hypothesis is much easier than proving one.