Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well actualy it is. In my own wery oldtown, there is a piece of palace remaining next to parking lot. All the submitions were nothing of rebuild, although plenty of historical data. Only glass, concrete and boxy shapes. Something is broken with architects in general.
It's complex. Imagine you inherit a COBOL codebase, would you expand it further or would you try to add a functional microservice in the language of the day? Ok, you can say: the codebase is not COBOL, is C and is beautifully done. However all architects studied Art History and Aesthetics, so, at least, they have a more informed opinion on what defines a good codebase than a layman. Probably we could give them the be…
More like a hive-mind indoctrination on the legacy of tired modernism and its contemporary varieties.
Seeing an old building as COBOL - something not to be inspired from and immitate and continue to build similarly, but to rewrite and replace with something entirely else - is an example of that.
Better to see a Le Corbusier building as Brainfuck:
++++++++++[>+++++++>++++++++++>+++++.>+.+++++++
..+++.>++..+++.------.--------.>+.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck