Live data from Hacker News

Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

papercut.com

11–20 of 31 posts

Re: Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

#11
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like if range is limited you'd need an array of multiple launchers, strategically distributed around the office to provide the most efficient coverage.

That would be especially awesome if multiple launchers engaged in the attack, resulting in a multi-directional barrage.

Reserved for particularly heinous breakages of the regression tests, perhaps?

Re: Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

#12

>It works on a deep psychological level to offer vast productivity improvements. some other extremely effective methods used in [another organization where people are treated like sh!t] the Russian Army: blocking access to the exit door, restroom and/or food/water, gang-chaining and/to the utility pipes, forcing to wear gas mask [and if weather is warm enough - rubberized fullbody chemical weapons protective suite] .…

Which is why 'Russian Army' is synonymous with productivity and effectiveness.

Re: Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

#14
I love how people are worried about the possibility of deep, everlasting psychological scars.

I work at the OSUOSL. Some of our finer (read: less uptight) patrons occasionally donate Nerf weaponry. Getting shot at with Nerf guns is not uncommon, and really isn't that big of a deal. I do not constantly glance over my shoulder in fear of a Nerf raid.

Re: Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

#15

I love how people are worried about the possibility of deep, everlasting psychological scars. I work at the OSUOSL. Some of our finer (read: less uptight) patrons occasionally donate Nerf weaponry. Getting shot at with Nerf guns is not uncommon, and really isn't that big of a deal. I do not constantly glance over my shoulder in fear of a Nerf raid.

We also have Nerf guns hear, but we use them only in sporting matches. (I.e. running around and shooting each other.)

If you break the build, you get to wear a ridiculous party hat, until you fix it.

On the upside, we have beer.

(We also have a USB launcher, but only because we had to make sure all USB devices we could think of would work with our software.)

Re: Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

#17

As someone working in this office I must warn others of the constant fear this little device instils in you. It's like working at aperture science, the emphasis on testing is maniacal.

The CEO of Aperture Science was torn up and thrown into a fire.

Re: Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

#18

>It works on a deep psychological level to offer vast productivity improvements. some other extremely effective methods used in [another organization where people are treated like sh!t] the Russian Army: blocking access to the exit door, restroom and/or food/water, gang-chaining and/to the utility pipes, forcing to wear gas mask [and if weather is warm enough - rubberized fullbody chemical weapons protective suite] .…

Which is why 'Russian Army' is synonymous with productivity and effectiveness.

Sounds like the beginning of Full Metal Jacket.

Re: Continuous Integration Failure? Use USB Missiles

#20
post #3

What is to stop developers from logging in remotely to commit changes, knowing that any attack will be directed at an empty chair?

I doubt anyone would be threatened enough by foam projectiles to try to circumvent it. Now, getting someone else attacked for no reason is a different story. That would be amusing.

It could be stopped by setting a piece of cardboard a few inches behind your head.
Post reply on HN