Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s a fallacy to think that just because people want to do something it is valuable. People have wanted to do some insanely wasteful or horrible things in the past.
"Want" has nothing to do with it. If people are willing to pay money for a service, that service is by definition valuable. Many thousands of people are willing to pay money in the form of gas fees to transact on the Ethereum network, so the network must be providing value. Whether you think the endpoints (assets/coins/whatever) themselves have value is irrelevant. I have a feeling that whatever definition you're usi…
This is only true if you define "value" to mean "people are willing to pay money for it."
But that's a useless and circular definition. It's only tolerated because assuming that money is a proxy for value was useful for making crude models in economics.