Live data from Hacker News

Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

wsj.com

11–20 of 354 posts

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#11

California is prematurely closing its perfectly good nuclear reactor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_Canyon_Power_Plant#Clos...

Thanks to the "Friends of the Earth" and "Natural Resources Defense Council" for pushing us to coal, natural gas, and blackouts... Also raising rates to pay for the premature decomissioning.

' https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-scrambles-to-find-el...

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#12

It's interesting how research into nuclear tech has resulted in one thing that can get us all killed and one thing that can save us all from being killed.

When you compare the energy density of nuclear to chemical materials, it sorta makes sense. It’s almost mind-boggling in its potential. In the early days of atomic energy it’s easy to see why people (or at least sci-fi)l authors) imagined so much promise. We really thought we were entering a new era in humanity. Sadly, it didn’t really work out that way, and the most significant application of this new energy source ended up being weapons. Interestingly, those opposed to nuclear technology only managed to stop its peaceful application.

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#13
post #6

We can't build reactors fast enough. And electricity is only a part of what generates emissions. It's no where close to a solution. Looking up the world's energy numbers, how much of total energy production and emissions are from electricity, how long it takes to build a nuclear power plant, how many nuclear power plants are built per year etc. will show you this.

^ This. Also, It's the Wall Street Journal, so consider the source, its own by Rupert Murdoch, whose media companies, until very recently were climate change deniers, so from a rather crude sort of climate denialism, they will likely move to supporting technical "climate fixes" spruiked by the fossil fuel industries. This is a more subtle way of sabotaging real climate action.

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#15
post #6

We can't build reactors fast enough. And electricity is only a part of what generates emissions. It's no where close to a solution. Looking up the world's energy numbers, how much of total energy production and emissions are from electricity, how long it takes to build a nuclear power plant, how many nuclear power plants are built per year etc. will show you this.

If it were important to us, we could build modular reactors on a massive scale. There are several manufacturers with serious designs. And yes, electricity is "only a part", but it's a big part. A solution needn't be a singular one to make a huge difference. Personally, I think nuclear isn't our best choice. But it is a viable choice and we could make it work.

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#17

It's interesting how research into nuclear tech has resulted in one thing that can get us all killed and one thing that can save us all from being killed.

When you compare the energy density of nuclear to chemical materials, it sorta makes sense. It’s almost mind-boggling in its potential. In the early days of atomic energy it’s easy to see why people (or at least sci-fi)l authors) imagined so much promise. We really thought we were entering a new era in humanity. Sadly, it didn’t really work out that way, and the most significant application of this new energy source…

> We really thought we were entering a new era in humanity.

The nuclear power industry has really only existed for a generation. The promise is still there.

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#18

California is prematurely closing its perfectly good nuclear reactor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_Canyon_Power_Plant#Clos...

Thanks to the "Friends of the Earth" and "Natural Resources Defense Council" for pushing us to coal, natural gas, and blackouts... Also raising rates to pay for the premature decomissioning. ' https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-scrambles-to-find-el...

The blackouts are because of fire-risk from transmission lines, and this is largely because PGE paid out bonuses instead of paying for needed repairs to the transmission system.

This group of corrupt execs are the same people entrusted to make safety and maintenance decisions for Diablo Canyon.

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#19
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you compare the energy density of nuclear to chemical materials, it sorta makes sense. It’s almost mind-boggling in its potential. In the early days of atomic energy it’s easy to see why people (or at least sci-fi)l authors) imagined so much promise. We really thought we were entering a new era in humanity. Sadly, it didn’t really work out that way, and the most significant application of this new energy source…

> We really thought we were entering a new era in humanity. The nuclear power industry has really only existed for a generation. The promise is still there.

> The nuclear power industry has really only existed for a generation.

More than 60 years is, by the usual means of counting generations, at least two and pushing three generations.

Re: Nuclear power is the best climate-change solution

#20

Related, “The Real Reason Biden’s Climate Agenda Is Failing Is Because It’s Anti-Nuclear”: https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/the-real-reason-... The author of the above article also wrote a book called “Apocalypse Never” that explores practical approaches to managing climate change and recently appeared on the Jordan Peterson podcast to talk about it, including the role of nuclear energy: https://podcasts.a…

Yes, that’s pretty much what I suspected.
Post reply on HN