Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
11–20 of 221 posts
Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
#12If I didn't have a dog, I would definitely spend a few years in places like Portugal, Thailand, Vietnam, and other countries in which I could have a nice experience relatively cheaply. The time zone is a bit of a challenge though, as work starting at midnight makes it hard to enjoy.
For settling down, though, I would have a hard time living too far from a big city. I've tried to live the quieter life, but I just need the energy that comes with those large communities. Boston, NYC, London, Toronto, Chicago. Preferably a small town house near public transportation.
Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
#13Was there for a ~week and it was super cool, made huge progress on a project during work hours, and enjoyed every minute of it.
I still prefer the 'city' life long-term.
Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
#14Also, lots of the replies so far in this thread mention big cities. I'm wondering what the appeal of cities would be in a 100% remote world without restaurants as, presumably, restaurant workers would be moving to jobs that are remote, no? Or are they just the new serf class?
Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
#15Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
#16I've always thought Vancouver, BC would be a nice spot but, it's quite expensive.
Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
#17Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?
#18Somewhere in the middle of nowhere. I currently live in a small town in the mountains. Love the mountain aspect of it. The townspeople are progressive in some ways (they try to be 'woke'), but extremely regressive when it comes to development (NIMBYism on steroids). Housing is a major problem, all the restaurants are shit, nothing gets built pretty much ever, most of the tax burden is on the few businesses there are,…