Live data from Hacker News

Fuck.com (1997)

links.net

81–90 of 109 posts

Re: Fuck.com (1997)

#81
post #30

I lost quixote.com (which I'd had since domain registrations were free) to a missed renewal while I was in grad school. To add insult to injury, the ultimate owner of the domain name had a parking lot filled with trucks with quixote.com painted on the side that I had to drive past every day on my way to the university.

Were you in Los Angeles? If so, I used to drive past the same lot!

Yep. driving down La Cienega from Pico/Robertson on my way to CalState Long Beach

Re: Fuck.com (1997)

#82
There was some dirty business going on here. Several dozen people wanted to register domains that were arbitrarily deemed to be inappropriate. When the policy changed, they weren't offered to the first person who made the request, but to users that were hand-picked by the powers-that-be.

Re: Fuck.com (1997)

#84

I was trying to register this too in 1994. I guess it was a race between several of us to register stupid domains. I was also bending their ears to get them to let me register the remaining single-character dotcoms. It is heartwarming to see the Internic form on that page - you used to type up the text file and email it to them and wait. You could have pretty much any domain you wanted in 1994. Except fuck.com. Also,…

Nowadays website using IP without https are blocked behind a red wall by main stream browsers

Re: Fuck.com (1997)

#87

http://www.links.net/webpub/domains.html says: > It used to be free, now you have to pay $50 a year for the priviledge ofyour own address. Some people aren't standing for it, Refuse to Pay!. The "Refuse to Pay!" link 404s, but is present in the Wayback Machine, and is an amusing read: https://web.archive.org/web/19970606222403/www.alaska.net/~n...

Imagine if registration had stayed free, there'd be no domain squatters, and that cool idea you had that only works if the domain is available would be possible!

Blackrock and Bloomberg would be squatting on the entire web, and we'd be back to using BBS / newsgroups to get away from them.

Re: Fuck.com (1997)

#88

I was trying to register this too in 1994. I guess it was a race between several of us to register stupid domains. I was also bending their ears to get them to let me register the remaining single-character dotcoms. It is heartwarming to see the Internic form on that page - you used to type up the text file and email it to them and wait. You could have pretty much any domain you wanted in 1994. Except fuck.com. Also,…

Nowadays website using IP without https are blocked behind a red wall by main stream browsers

Come to think of it, I’ve never seen a plain IP used with HTTPS.

Re: Fuck.com (1997)

#89
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would bother me too since they're only buying it to resell. Over a decade ago I emailed a domainer/squatter to ask about a domain that matches my sister's married surname. It was the ccTLD version, not even the .com. At the time, they told me they didn't accept offers of less than $2k, so I offered them $100 as an insult and forgot about it. 8 years later I get a random email asking me if I'm still interested in…

There is. Adding a massive amount of TLDs. I’ve wanted my family name ccTLD, but it’s been occupied by a gospel choir. Fortunately there are hundreds to choose from now.

A project called Handshake[0] may be of interest to you. Namebase[1] is a popular on-ramp but you could also obtain your own TLDs via a desktop wallet[2]. There’s even a lightweight resolver[3] to access Handshake domains.

The project is slowly gaining traction, what with Namecheap and Porkbun getting in on it too.

- [0]: https://handshake.org

- [1]: https://namebase.io

- [2]: https://bobwallet.io

- [3]: https://impervious.com/fingertip

Post reply on HN