Live data from Hacker News

Metabook

metabook.fyi

71–80 of 114 posts

Re: Metabook

#71

   * First everyone ignores Meta Inc.

   * Then everyone laughs at Meta Inc. 
Judging from the comments, since it is hard for everyone to ignore Meta Inc and also looking at the emotional reaction to Meta's drive to build the metaverse with other metaverse-related companies, is history going to repeat itself with Facebook Inc. winning once again, but under a different name with the same CEO?

Re: Metabook

#72

Funny story about my Metaverse experience... I assume this will be an unusual opinion, but I'm actually very excited about Metaverse. I probably would not have chosen Facebook as the stewards of the first big VR-world, but I've been waiting a long time for some big co to make an investment in this direction. I think a (little m) metaverse is the obvious evolution for VR and could become ubiquitous. I left Facebook ab…

If you registered with a fictional name and not your real name, that will get you banned. And also if you use a picture of a pet or cartoon avatar..

>If you registered with a fictional name and not your real name,

sounds like a thing programmers believe about names: that you can tell when one is fictional or real.

Re: Metabook

#73
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since when does stock value reflect the ethical concerns about a company? In any case, best wishes.

My current investment plan is to pour money into whatever I see getting hated on the most.

I am happy if that makes more sense to you than to me

Re: Metabook

#74

This undifferentiated torrent of anger is diluting the message. I am not naive so I also expect the zuckerverse to be a laughingstock at best and very sinister at worst, but let them actually build it first . By being so critical before it even exist you are only sending the message "we will hate it irrespective of what it actually is because we hold a grudge". Furthermore I think the "metaberg is a nefarious spy" me…

> let them actually build it first

Not if the point of the criticism is "this should not be built by this company". It doesn't matter if the first version looks innocuous, if you can't trust that the next version will be.

More to the point, something this important shouldn't be built by any one or two or three companies, no matter who they are.

Re: Metabook

#75
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We are absolutely being forced. Perhaps you didn't realise, but lots of kids were on Google Classroom, Zoom, etc last year during lockdown. This metaverse BS aims to be an even more contained aggregation of all this. If you watch the presentation ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9vWShsmE20 ), its meant to include all aspects of one's life. Talk about lock in!

I'm not oblivious to the threat of lock-ins. But as far as remote tools go, my experience during the lockdown was that of competitive capitalism working at its best.

There are lots of viable competitors in the field of remote meeting and groupware tools, but most people aren't in a position to choose which ones to use and which ones to avoid — they're generally required to use a particular one by work or school.

Re: Metabook

#76
post #61

Funny story about my Metaverse experience... I assume this will be an unusual opinion, but I'm actually very excited about Metaverse. I probably would not have chosen Facebook as the stewards of the first big VR-world, but I've been waiting a long time for some big co to make an investment in this direction. I think a (little m) metaverse is the obvious evolution for VR and could become ubiquitous. I left Facebook ab…

> I probably would not have chosen Facebook as the stewards of the first big VR-world You make it sound as if Facebook will actually be the stewards of the first big VR-world, but all they did was announce something to divert attention from a serious scandal. They might as well have announced that they'll work on colonising Mars, and you'd be sad for missing your opportunity to get prime real-estate on Amazonis Plani…

Love the HN swagger-talk even when it’s misinformed. Maybe they’ve accelerated the rebrand due to PR issues, but they’ve been heavily investing in AR/VR/metaverse for years, with Oculus back in 2014 and in the past few years poaching top silicon talent for low-power ASIC hardware. Their pseudo-AR RayBans commercially deployed few months ago. This has been a long time coming… FB has its issues to fix but no progress is going to come from falsehoods being thrown around.

Re: Metabook

#78

Funny story about my Metaverse experience... I assume this will be an unusual opinion, but I'm actually very excited about Metaverse. I probably would not have chosen Facebook as the stewards of the first big VR-world, but I've been waiting a long time for some big co to make an investment in this direction. I think a (little m) metaverse is the obvious evolution for VR and could become ubiquitous. I left Facebook ab…

If you registered with a fictional name and not your real name, that will get you banned. And also if you use a picture of a pet or cartoon avatar..

I wonder if a VPN was involved. They probably have a set of red flags with different weights. Something tells me a VPN is a big red flag for them when it comes to new signups.

Re: Metabook

#79
post #76
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I probably would not have chosen Facebook as the stewards of the first big VR-world You make it sound as if Facebook will actually be the stewards of the first big VR-world, but all they did was announce something to divert attention from a serious scandal. They might as well have announced that they'll work on colonising Mars, and you'd be sad for missing your opportunity to get prime real-estate on Amazonis Plani…

Love the HN swagger-talk even when it’s misinformed. Maybe they’ve accelerated the rebrand due to PR issues, but they’ve been heavily investing in AR/VR/metaverse for years, with Oculus back in 2014 and in the past few years poaching top silicon talent for low-power ASIC hardware. Their pseudo-AR RayBans commercially deployed few months ago. This has been a long time coming… FB has its issues to fix but no progress i…

They're not building a metaverse any more than anyone who's building VR apps or developing 3D games. It's possible that Zuckerberg wishes they were, and is trying to make himself believe that they are, but a company that is yet to master text communication has no idea how to build a metaverse. What they're doing is working on some VR meeting/chat apps.

Re: Metabook

#80
I wish this website did not recommend another walled garden, Signal, and recommended Matrix instead. That would be in line with other recommendations of federated platforms.
Post reply on HN