Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
strongtowns.org
Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
1–10 of 564 posts
Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#2> The answer to this isn't to lower our standards for design or to be dismissive of the things that are really lovable about these places. The answer is simply to allow a lot more Milwaukee Avenues to exist. And the same goes for the likes of all of today's beloved, "charming" historic districts.
It's hard to me to point at the right paradigm, but it reminds me a lot of the "trickle down" principle, of flooding the top with valuable properties at affordable prices and expect that some of it will still be there for the plebes like us once the top people are satiated.
I'm totally in for building more quality housing and neighborhoods, but there needs to be a lot more thought put into it.
Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#3Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#4Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#5> Places like this are expensive because places like this are scarce, and scarce things almost always become expensive. > The answer to this isn't to lower our standards for design or to be dismissive of the things that are really lovable about these places. The answer is simply to allow a lot more Milwaukee Avenues to exist. And the same goes for the likes of all of today's beloved, "charming" historic districts. It…
Well, there definitely won't be any still there if you don't build something in the first place.
Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#6> Places like this are expensive because places like this are scarce, and scarce things almost always become expensive. > The answer to this isn't to lower our standards for design or to be dismissive of the things that are really lovable about these places. The answer is simply to allow a lot more Milwaukee Avenues to exist. And the same goes for the likes of all of today's beloved, "charming" historic districts. It…
Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#7> Places like this are expensive because places like this are scarce, and scarce things almost always become expensive. > The answer to this isn't to lower our standards for design or to be dismissive of the things that are really lovable about these places. The answer is simply to allow a lot more Milwaukee Avenues to exist. And the same goes for the likes of all of today's beloved, "charming" historic districts. It…
Walkable neighborhoods can be build cheaply. What makes them expensive is demand and land.
Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#8I can bike or walk everywhere, and the only reason I have a car is that it makes grocery shopping much, much easier. I am not very green or anything, I just like to keep things simple.
You can check out my hoods in Helsinki in Google maps and streetview (not giving my actual address but close enough).
There are has several high quality universities, and several well known startups and game studios operating within the view I linked below. All of it is walkable/cyclable/public transportable.
https://www.google.com/maps/@60.192987,24.8679369,10181m/dat...
Most of Scandinavia is similar, as you get to mainland Europe with bigger population density the story diversifies, but we don't really hear "only rich people can walk" stories here.
Re: Our self imposed scarcity of nice places
#9I don’t get why there are so few walkable places. The demand is there and willing to pay a premium, and the small lots and narrow streets should make it fairly inexpensive to build.
There is also some scale issues. A walkable city is great. A walkable neighborhood might not be, not if it is too small and everyone has to drive to work, to the grocer and to the doctor. Public transport makes only sense if it can move enough people. All drivers (so everyone) will be uncomfortable with the walkable, but disconnected small neighborhood.
There has been some rethinking in the last decade or so and cities are trying to become more walkable, more livable and less car focused with increasing frequency.