The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
1–10 of 60 posts
Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#2Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#3Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#4Oh, burn! /s
Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#5> Most of my time is spent on talking to other human beings, replying emails (30%~40% of my time), and thinking (!!!), which is not considered as “real work” by engineers :) Oh, burn! /s
Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#6Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#7Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#8> Most of my time is spent on talking to other human beings, replying emails (30%~40% of my time), and thinking (!!!), which is not considered as “real work” by engineers :) Oh, burn! /s
I don't think it's not considered real work by engineers, but by non-engineer product managers.
Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#9I wonder though if the niche search engine market can fetch them enough money to be profitable.
Re: The boring technology behind a one-person Internet company (2018)
#10Interesting post to see how this solution is accomplished, but how is this a one-person company, if there are contractors? How are the contractors utilized and how much do they cost on average? Are the contractors needed or could this be done by a single engineer?
It's pretty clear that if you want to shorten time to market, you leverage existing assets - when it's people using React or FLOSS databases, no one bats an eye, but farming out tasks here and there that aren't worth your burn rate (pay someone cheaper who can do it faster), how is that different?
When the government hires contractors they're not considered part of the government workforce (ie, civil servants).