Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 94

mozilla.org

41–50 of 340 posts

Re: Firefox 94

#41
post #35
post #10

>On Windows, there will now be fewer interruptions because Firefox won’t prompt you for updates. Instead, a background agent will download and install updates even if Firefox is closed. How considerate of them, I felt I didn't have enough auto-updating background agents yet.

I assume there is an option

There is under Settings General FF Updates.

Re: Firefox 94

#42

> Firefox no longer warns you by default when you exit the browser or close a window using a menu, button, or three-key command. Why would anyone want this? On macOS it is infuriantingly easy to press CMD + Q by accident. Why would you not want to confirm that you actually want to close ALL your tabs?

It still asks for confirmation on Command+Q - and provides a way to disable that behaviour if you're not prone to that typo

Re: Firefox 94

#43
post #13

> On Windows, there will now be fewer interruptions because Firefox won’t prompt you for updates. Instead, a background agent will download and install updates even if Firefox is closed. I rather they didn't. EDIT: Ah good, they have an option in the General Settings to disable the background updater.

Why hasn't Microsoft created a system service for this? It's just inefficient to have each and every installed app run a service… I suppose they take care of it for Windows Store apps, but I don't see why they couldn't make a service for other apps too. Same on the Mac, of course.

There should be something like /etc/cron.daily in windows. The jobs run sequentially so don't overload bandwidth and other resource (hopefully).

Re: Firefox 94

#44

> Firefox no longer warns you by default when you exit the browser or close a window using a menu, button, or three-key command. Why would anyone want this? On macOS it is infuriantingly easy to press CMD + Q by accident. Why would you not want to confirm that you actually want to close ALL your tabs?

I think it's because "restore tabs on startup" is also the default now. So you won't lose your tabs and this will generally do the right thing.

There really needs to be an alternative "close all tabs now" command to replace this.

Re: Firefox 94

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. It's also shrinking to be almost the only reason I run Firefox. I absolutely loathe the constant tinkering with UI and settings, they just can't seem to leave stuff alone. The ghacks user.js does get rid of a lot of nuisances, but I also know some people also want to get rid of the user.js config option.

I wonder if any of them read HN or feedback from the feedback page or anything?

The "Submit feedback" menu entry now links to their ideas@mozilla platform, launched several months ago:

https://mozilla.crowdicity.com

They seem to be reading and considering some of the suggestions, though none have been implemented yet.

- Most popular idea (819 votes): Compact Interface Option - https://mozilla.crowdicity.com/post/719764

- Most critical idea (in my opinion): Expand support for extensions for the stable android version - https://mozilla.crowdicity.com/post/723675

Re: Firefox 94

#46
I am typing this from Firefox, which I switched back to right after Quantum.

I don't want to give an impression that I'm a shill, but I'm getting more and more intrigued by Brave every day. I think they made the right call by focusing on crypto, their search indexing technique is very unique (and it works!), as is their BAT attention token. They are _trying_ to doing something different, Firefox is not.

What I instead get from Firefox for trying to support their monetization, is seductive-looking spammy ads on their New Tab page that come back even after I dismiss them. Brave ads vs Firefox ads would be a tough comparison - the former is more annoying and intrusive, but I definitely think I prefer them. And long term, I think I would bet on Brave _over_ Firefox, unless something changes.

Re: Firefox 94

#47
post #5

> With 94, you’ll find a selection of six fun seasonal Colorways (available for a limited time only). For a limited time only? What the heck? Feels like Starbucks. Otherwise great release of course.

"Colorways"? Like what everyone else calls "themes"? Yeah, you don't actually need to make up your own word for that.

That, plus the fact that this is the lead bullet point for their new release makes me think "way too many marketers, not enough engineers".

Re: Firefox 94

#48
post #35
post #10

>On Windows, there will now be fewer interruptions because Firefox won’t prompt you for updates. Instead, a background agent will download and install updates even if Firefox is closed. How considerate of them, I felt I didn't have enough auto-updating background agents yet.

I assume there is an option

Yes, you've been able to disable auto-updates for as long as auto-updates have existed.

Re: Firefox 94

#49

It has made me really sad that I have had to quite using Firefox, as I've enjoyed the technical improvements they have been making, but the new ads in the address bar thing is just non negotiable, I will not be a part of that.

The what now?!

Re: Firefox 94

#50
post #10

>On Windows, there will now be fewer interruptions because Firefox won’t prompt you for updates. Instead, a background agent will download and install updates even if Firefox is closed. How considerate of them, I felt I didn't have enough auto-updating background agents yet.

They've had the MozillaMaintenance service for several years on Windows already, what has changed now?

Based on my reading of https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/what-mozilla-maintenanc..., the current behavior is that Firefox checks for updates only when the app is open, and then only briefly starts the MozillaMaintenance service to avoid the UAC dialog. The MozillaMaintenance service isn't what is responsible for checking for updates.

It's not clear to me if MozillaMaintenance is the service that will be checking for updates, or if there is a new service.

Post reply on HN