Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see any valid reason for Wacom to look at what application people use. And in a proper operating system that information should not be easily available (not without the users' consent).
The need to know what art applications to test their product against and what hardware configurations they might need to write drivers for. For example, is 99% of their customer base using GiMP or are they using Photoshop? Its important to know how to allocate their testing resources. They could ask permission first but this sort of telemetry is a nothingburger in my opinion, as unpopular as that might be on this for…
No, they must.
> this sort of telemetry is a nothingburger
I strongly disagree, what runs on my computer is my business and if Wacom wants to know, they can ask, and I'll tell them 'no, sorry that is not something you need to know'.
It's called consent and it's not up to Wacom to decide that I will think it is a nothing burger.
> in my opinion, as unpopular as that might be on this forum.
That's the whole point of consent: some people give it, others withhold it. You are just as entitled to your opinion as I am to mine and that is why they should ask, it's not that you get to decide for me that it's a nothing burger, just like I won't decide for you that it isn't.