another DNS to avoid... using anything but your ISP's DNS decrease privacy... unless you are using a VPN, then the DNS should be from your VPN's ISP
Some ISPs actually sell DNS responses to the highest-bidding advertiser. ISP DNS is the worst possible choice for all users. https://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/pubs/networking/redirectingdns...
Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
101–110 of 132 posts
Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#102This is the first time I've seen a certificate issued to an IP address. Cloudflare does the same thing for 1.1.1.1. X509v3 Subject Alternative Name: DNS:dns.google, DNS:dns.google.com, DNS:*.dns.google.com, DNS:8888.google, DNS:dns64.dns.google, IP Address:8.8.8.8, IP Address:8.8.4.4, IP Address:2001:4860:4860:0:0:0:0:8888, IP Address:2001:4860:4860:0:0:0:0:8844, IP Address:2001:4860:4860:0:0:0:0:6464, IP Address:200…
Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
The surveillance is additive (unless you use). Since DNS traffic is not encrypted, the ISP still sees everything even if you switch it, and now so does Google. The practical benefit is that some ISPs run bad DNS servers that e.g. automatically redirect nxdomains to their spam pages. If you use Google or Cloudflare you can bypass this particular anti-feature.
>The practical benefit is that some ISPs run bad DNS servers that e.g. automatically redirect nxdomains to their spam pages. If you use Google or Cloudflare you can bypass this particular anti-feature. As I discussed here[0], my goto DNS server is 192.168.xxx.91. Which is to say I run my own recursive resolver. This avoids ISP DNS server issues as well as other issues (like these[1][2]). Also, Google/Cloudflare/whoev…
AFAIK, the only way to prevent your ISP from collecting the domains you visit is if you use something like dns over https. Even then, you're tls connection leaks the domain via sni (hopefully this hole will get plugged by tls 1.3).
Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#104Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
One has to buy the block of IP addresses, from ARIN or some other Internet governance body, that contains the IP you’re looking for
Once you own outright a block of IP4 addresses, is there a recurring charge to allow you to keep it? And who, if anyone, gets paid.
Almost all of IPv4 is allocated by IANA to Regional Internet Registries that in turn allocate them to customers like Google and Verizon. You pay yearly maintenance fees to keep the addresses assigned to you.
Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#106Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
It can't only be that, or 127.1 would not work. It is doing some parsing beyond just calling a parseInt on each of them in order to recognize domain names and use name resolution rather than directly putting the bytes in the IP header. That must be why 0x9000000.-16250872 doesn't work (if negative worked, that should also resolve to 8.8.8.8).
I looked into this a while back, IIRC BSD added the "omit zeroes" as a nonstandard convenience feature and other OSes copied it. I'm far afk for I'd find my notes on this.
127.256 is valid, and would be equivalent to 127.0.1.0. The last integer can be up to 16777215 (2²⁴-1).
Similarly, if you instead include three groups of integers, the first two represents one octet each, and the last represents two. 127.2.256 is equivalent to 127.2.1.0.
Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#108Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#109For those interested in more memorable DNS IPs, there is the following: Just be careful, because TWNIC/Quad101 was subjected to a BGP hijack in 2019[0] 101.101.101.101 [TWNIC] 80.80.80.80 [FREENOM][1] 4.2.2.2 [Level 3] [0] https://www.manrs.org/2019/05/public-dns-in-taiwan-the-lates... [1] https://www.freenom.world/en/index.html?lang=en
Re: Google DNS at 010.010.010.010
#110When I hover over the link, Chromium shows " https://8.8.8.8 ". And when I manually typed in " http://010.010.010.010 ", it converts it to 8.8.8.8. I also tried it with the integer representation of 8.8.8.8 and that converts it immediately as well. It looks like this is just the browser converting it. Am I missing something?