Live data from Hacker News

Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

antigonejournal.com

181–190 of 203 posts

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> modern political meaning Going straight from linguistics to politics… that’s a little framing, isn’t it? The establishment of an extension of meaning for ‘gender’ is not a feminist power move, but recognized as useful distinction all over the place. > “Sexologist John Money is often regarded as the first to introduce a distinction between biological sex and gender identity/role in 1955, although Madison Bentley had…

I'm surprised you'd reference John Money and not expect politics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money#Controversies

Oh, are you? So the fact he is an asshole makes everything he did and thought “politics”? Is everything, any scientist does, which supports a world view you don’t like, “politics”?

Does this somehow invalidate the correction about the origins of ‘gender’’s popular meaning?

Have you read the article I linked? Do you still agree the distinction between sex and gender is all “politics”?

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#182
post #3

I have always found gender in German confusing. This gives a little more context. Of course in English we have a tiny bit of gendered nouns where we append "man" or "woman" to some job titles based on the gender of the person holding the title (policeman, congressman, etc). This has become problematic when we use the plural. Also in English we have gendered pronouns which has become a hot topic in the last couple of…

I always liked this take on the "policeman, congressman" issue (back when that was the thing that people got upset about in newspaper columns): http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/purity.html 25 years old, and probably the most striking thing from this distance is the implicit assumption that all the readers would believe in racism, but not sexism.

36 years old, right?

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Atheism is the negative space defined by 'belief in a god'. The position that 'god' is incoherent is in that negative space. Atheism is no more incoherent than your own comment, just for including the quoted word 'god' in its description. Wasn't Ayer an atheist, anyway? I think you might be misrepresenting him. Edit: Well, there's a subtlety here. The set of beliefs that concern god is an incoherent category (for the…

Because you didn’t read the book so you think I’m lying about what he said? He held various opinions about these issues through his life, as one would expect from an active thinker. But in the book I mentioned he specifically says that it is incoherent to claim to be an atheist or an agnostic, because both these descriptions implicitly refer to the “god” non-concept. And no, you can’t define a negative space by using…

An atheist is anyone who lacks an affirmed belief in the existence of God - God being a powerful thinking entity responsible for the creation of the reality in which we exist.

Sure, we can’t make sense of how reality exists, or find evidence that a god is responsible - but is that sufficient to assert incoherence? Is it less incoherent to believe that reality has a property of self-creation, as many physicists do?

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#184
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I dislike the term "gender" in linguistics. Many languages have grammatical gender that has nothing to do with masculine/feminine. You realize that the use of gender for grammatical noun class is the original meaning of the word, correct? Gender comes from the Latin genus, generis (via Old French), which means type, kind, sort. The genders in Latin were called masculine, feminine, and neuter because one of the noun…

great rebuttal, i learned something new! i wonder, do you happen to know how this might impact the conversation between gender and sex being two different descriptors? i'm unsure of how to go about looking at the etymological origins of both words, so help in that regard could prove just as useful. thanks.

I don't think the etymological origins of the words really impact the current conversation. The meaning of words depends on how they are used, and "gender" today have quite a different meaning when talking about human gender identity than when talking about grammar.

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#185
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i've found that there are arguments being had between people my age that sex is a biological descriptor (M/F) and that gender is a looser, more amorphous descriptor. for instance, you can be born a man (your biological sex) and identify as non-binary (your gender). i'm interested to see how the origin of the words could contribute to that discussion.

Various philosophers, such as Wittgenstein, have pointed out that much of what sounds like discussion only exists because one can arrange words into grammatically sensible sentences. That doesn't mean the discussion is actually about anything. People who know the words “Earth” and “flat” can theorize about whether the Earth is flat, but it’s a waste of time to pay any attention to them. A “non-binary” “gender” is jus…

> A “non-binary” “gender” is just a noise with no idea attached to it.

Are you talking about grammar here? Because in many (most?) languages gender is not binary.

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#186
post #16
post #11

I dislike the term "gender" in linguistics. Many languages have grammatical gender that has nothing to do with masculine/feminine. "Noun class" gives the idea better. Noun classes in Indo-European and a couple other major language families happen to somewhat align with grammatical markers indicating animal/human sex. But it doesn't have to. Many languages make an animate/inanimate distinction. It is one of those myst…

I wonder if there are any examples of this in languages from the many cultures past and present that always recognized more than two sex-derived genders.

Danish have two grammatical genders, "neuter" and "common". Male and female have same grammatical gender. So conflating gender and sexual identity becomes really confusing!

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#187
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it's a linguistics term. Animate things are perceived as having human-like agency. Many languages have a grammatical category clustering things like large non-human animals, the weather, or fire, or trees, together with humans. Animate. Everything else is inanimate and presumably less alive. In English, many animals are referred to with "he" or "she". Being a mammal, large, being domesticated, being familiar, ar…

When I first learned English in school (almost 40 years ago) I was told that very young babies were grammatically neuter. Now I never hear anyone using “it” for a baby. Has English changed in the last decades, or was my teacher wrong?

It can be considered an insult to get the sex of a baby wrong because males are generally considered more valuable than females. It's socially better the refer to an infant as inanimate than to mistakenly refer to a male child using the female gender. That said, as soon as one knows the correct sex (often indicated by the colour of cloth used in swaddling or clothing, or other markers like design patterns of trucks or ponies, as appropriate) it's important to start using the corresponding grammatical gender otherwise the early indoctrination lacks the enforcement required for a lifetime of identity with arbitrary social constructs like masculinity and femininity.

It's not a grammar rule, it's a social rule.

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For what it’s worth, English still has some remnants of a case system, too. We still distinguish the genitive case of nouns (with a case ending usually written “‘s”), and personal pronouns have four cases (I, me, my, mine).

You're right although the English 's technically isn't a case marker. You can see this because 's doesn't mark nouns, it marks whole phrases, in things like "the Queen of England's hat." Since it modifies phrases and not single words, while not being a word in its own right, it's a clitic and not a case marker. It does descend from the Germanic genitive case, though.

Thank you, you’re right! So I suppose English only marks case on pronouns.

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#189
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I dislike the term "gender" in linguistics. Many languages have grammatical gender that has nothing to do with masculine/feminine. You realize that the use of gender for grammatical noun class is the original meaning of the word, correct? Gender comes from the Latin genus, generis (via Old French), which means type, kind, sort. The genders in Latin were called masculine, feminine, and neuter because one of the noun…

Um... From TFA: When the Romans started to get interested in grammar, genus came to mean “kind” of noun or “gender”, but because genus could also refer to biological sex, male and female, these concepts were occasionally conflated.

that's a bit of a stretch.

Genere in Italian comes from the Latin word genus and means biological sex for people and animals but also kind.

  Translate genere to English

  noun
  1. gender
  2. kind
They ate not conflated, they depend on the context

What kind of beast is that? -> Che genere di bestia è?

What's that book genre? -> Di che genere è quel libro?

How to write gender questions -> come scrivere domande sul genere

Re: Gender in Latin and Beyond: A Philologist’s Take

#190
post #16
post #11

I dislike the term "gender" in linguistics. Many languages have grammatical gender that has nothing to do with masculine/feminine. "Noun class" gives the idea better. Noun classes in Indo-European and a couple other major language families happen to somewhat align with grammatical markers indicating animal/human sex. But it doesn't have to. Many languages make an animate/inanimate distinction. It is one of those myst…

I wonder if there are any examples of this in languages from the many cultures past and present that always recognized more than two sex-derived genders.

German
Post reply on HN