Meta
stratechery.com
Meta
1–10 of 210 posts
Re: Meta
#2Re: Meta
#3Re: Meta
#4Sorry but I just don’t like this name. The rebrand seems appropriate given the expanded ambition. What was wrong with horizon?
Re: Meta
#5Re: Meta
#6This article makes a very cogent point: Zuckerberg has too much baggage with the general public and Meta would be much better off if he stepped out of the light.
Re: Meta
#7It's amazing how much bike-shedding there is here around the name and logo, and how little capacity most have for what these changes actually mean.
Meta is going full in on the metaverse... so that's going to be hitting some critical mass fairly soon (less than a decade). And that's nuts. We should take this time to enjoy living before that moment. Who knows what changes it will bring, but surely enough that there will be no going back.
Re: Meta
#8>The fact that Facebook is uniquely held responsible for the societal problems engendered by the Internet does, I suspect, stem from the fact that Zuckerberg is an obvious target. How many people concerned about anti-vax rhetoric, for example, can even name the person in charge of YouTube, a far more potent vector? This article makes a very cogent point: Zuckerberg has too much baggage with the general public and Met…
Facebook and Zuckerberg were fairly blamed because they actively developed features that amplified misinformation, and refused to take any action to curb their damage.
Re: Meta
#9Re: Meta
#10It looks like a pretzel or the bag end of male genitalia.