The part I don't get is that the total project will cost over 1.5 billion USD and Charlie Munger, the value investor, will get his building and name on it for only 200 million. The art of the deal for him for sure. But the school is screwing themselves and the students for such a measly donation in terms of the totality of the deal.
Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
251–260 of 700 posts
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#252Interesting collision of the idea with the covid era. During an outbreak you’d want students to have a private airspace to go to and the possibility of ventilation. Update: from another comment, Munger designed a similar building in Michigan. It has great reviews! But, one of the top ones was “great until pandemic”. Adding this to clarify that, contra other comments, I don’t necessarily think Munger was mistaken. But…
No kidding! We just went through 2 years where this building would've been the absolute worst to grapple with. Imagine those 4,500 being told to sit out the pandemic in their rooms. How can they miss the problem when the worst case scenario for some idiotic design like this happened last year!
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#253From my point-of-view as a former firefighter, I would say this: A building meant to house 4500 students, with only two entrances? There's a word for that: deathtrap. Building this is setting UCSB up to be the site of the next Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire[1], Station Nightclub fire[2], or Hamlet Chicken Processing Plant fire[3]. At a first glance, based only on the information provided in the article, I'd say tha…
Surely building codes mandate a comprehensive evacuation design. There are clearly aesthetic complaints many people will have here, but realistically safety shouldn't be a problem. This is simply not a "large" building by skyscraper standards, and those can be built safely. Honestly... I think this is very much a taste thing. Is it so weird that I don't think this looks so bad at all? Yeah, yeah, no windows. But dens…
Surely building codes should mandate structural flaws and sinking foundations be fixed immediately.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/collapsed-miami-condo-had-...
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#254I’d rather have no roommate than a window.
You’d have seven roommates and would also have no window. Looking at the layout, it’s like sharing a tiny apartment with 7 other people. This is the worst part, if you have one disruptive person out of eight, they are going to make everyone else miserable. Hard to get sleep, hard to study.
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#255OK hold up, density is good. Let's not do some laundered CA-loves-housing-crunch here. But yes, the thing needs more entrances, windows, and also the floorspace needs vastly more street interaction. There is this sick thing where if you compare old and new buildings, and the streetscape is vastly less compact than it used to be. My favorite comparison is in Long Island City: https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7487041,-7…
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surely building codes mandate a comprehensive evacuation design. There are clearly aesthetic complaints many people will have here, but realistically safety shouldn't be a problem. This is simply not a "large" building by skyscraper standards, and those can be built safely. Honestly... I think this is very much a taste thing. Is it so weird that I don't think this looks so bad at all? Yeah, yeah, no windows. But dens…
Former firefighter cautions we should be skeptical of the safety of this plan, and your rebuttal is "surely building codes mandate..."? A zero-evidence rebuttal concerning the safety of 4500 students.
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#257Earlier quoted context omitted.
Note that many of the positive reviews are from pre-covid times and the two that coincide with the pandemic note how ill suited it is to such conditions.
I agree, but I'd also challenge that we shouldn't be designing our permanent, 100+ year structures around pandemics.
You do, in fact, want to have 100 year water systems that would work in a cholera epidemic. Designing buildings for good airflow will probably not go out of style either.
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#258There is nothing bad about this that I can see. If you don't want to live there, don't do it. But describing this as some kind of hellscape is way off the mark.
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are tons of windows and natural light in the common areas; the design is meant to encourage congregation there. The bedrooms are just for sleeping, dressing, and sex.
I count 64 bedrooms per "house". That's a lot of people for a single common area that doesn't seem that big.
Re: Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
Note that many of the positive reviews are from pre-covid times and the two that coincide with the pandemic note how ill suited it is to such conditions.
I agree, but I'd also challenge that we shouldn't be designing our permanent, 100+ year structures around pandemics.
Also, there are a bunch of things that we consider normal that were born of crisis: [1]
[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-05/the-curio...
[1] https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/war-famine-pestilence...