Yes, send more data to big companies like cloud front and google. They need it.
Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
51–60 of 82 posts
Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#52Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#53Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#54I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#55I did test 1.1.1.1 and found it to be pretty slow on long tail domains (obviously everyone is caching popular ones). I bascially ran a 'dig' with multiple DNS providers and CloudFlare was slowest among the bunch for long-tail domains. Here are the details: https://twitter.com/vladquant/status/1428761979808669704 CloudFlare never responded to this tweet.
Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#56Why do parents feel the need to control what their children do online? I had unrestricted internet access as a child and turned out fine. Although I must say, a DNS based approach is more benign than some of the horrendously invasive alternatives.
I see nothing wrong with blocking access to certain sites by default - protects us as well - if anyone of them have a problem with it, they can come and ask why it is blocked. Simples.
Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why aren't they just called infrequently used domains then?
>Why aren't they just called infrequently used domains then? You could call them "infrequent" but "long-tail" is also a common description to convey a Power Law distribution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_tail I think in this case about DNS caching, "long tail" is better than "infrequent". In the wikipedia graph, some of the domain lookups in yellow may be "frequent" (absolute sense) but simultaneously but much…
Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#58I did test 1.1.1.1 and found it to be pretty slow on long tail domains (obviously everyone is caching popular ones). I bascially ran a 'dig' with multiple DNS providers and CloudFlare was slowest among the bunch for long-tail domains. Here are the details: https://twitter.com/vladquant/status/1428761979808669704 CloudFlare never responded to this tweet.
I'm happy with Cloudflare, even if it's slightly slower.
Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#59Why do parents feel the need to control what their children do online? I had unrestricted internet access as a child and turned out fine. Although I must say, a DNS based approach is more benign than some of the horrendously invasive alternatives.
We have to teach our children to be good people, and how to process the world, and what we've already managed to process out of what we've seen throughout our own lives. If your strategy depends on censorship to provide a healthy path, I don't think it's going to be that healthy of an outcome.
Re: Setting Up 1.1.1.1 for Families on a Pi-Hole
#60The one thing Cloudflare DNS is missing is providing something like NextDNS. Choose your own filter lists (that are constantly updated), create multiple profiles to use according to the target device/location and enjoy as blocking at the DNS level. It’s not a complete match for something like uBlock Origin, but a lot of stuff still gets blocked with DNS filters.
Have you checked out Cloudflare Gateway? We used that to do DNS filtering on some iPads we deployed