Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any non-conspiratorial reason for archive.is's position on this?
Yes. From a technical standpoint, archive.is' stance is that it's actually important useful data that, more importantly, isn't a privacy violation. How much you agree with archive.is depends on a very technical understanding of the subject, or barring that, it depends on how much you buy Cloudflare's reasoning. Cloudflare's business would prefer you pay for Cloudflare (at large but specifically their anycast) instead…
Also, what about DNS resolvers that don’t support EDNS at all?