Live data from Hacker News

HP to buy Autonomy for $11 billion

ft.com

1–10 of 44 posts

Re: HP to buy Autonomy for $11 billion

#4

...along with plans to spin off its personal computer business. Damn, until now I'd missed that this wasn't "only" about phones and pads; HP's planning to become a software-only company! Very saddening.

They are still holding on to their server business it seems. So they are doubling down on their enterprise solutions and services, not unlike IBM.

Re: HP to buy Autonomy for $11 billion

#7
As an ex employee of Autonomy, i must say that its actually good news for the employees. I spoke to my ex-colleagues and they sounded upbeat. Autonomy was a sweat shop. You were paid pittance and employees outside cambridge were hardly recognized. It was one of the worst companies to work for.

Re: HP to buy Autonomy for $11 billion

#8
post #7

As an ex employee of Autonomy, i must say that its actually good news for the employees. I spoke to my ex-colleagues and they sounded upbeat. Autonomy was a sweat shop. You were paid pittance and employees outside cambridge were hardly recognized. It was one of the worst companies to work for.

Well, HP supposedly used to be one of the best places to work, so maybe if you mix heaven and hell, you'll end up with purgatory.

Re: HP to buy Autonomy for $11 billion

#9

...along with plans to spin off its personal computer business. Damn, until now I'd missed that this wasn't "only" about phones and pads; HP's planning to become a software-only company! Very saddening.

The "real" HP that most people think of was spun off as Agilent. HP that's left now is a hollow shell of its former self, just holding onto the brand name. Very sad.

Re: HP to buy Autonomy for $11 billion

#10
post #6

Even after today's surge (+75%), its market capitalization is $6.11B. Yesterday's market cap: $3.5B. Why would HP pay 3X its market value?

The normal reason for paying large premiums is that shareholders aren't interested in selling at the current market rate (otherwise in a liquid market they already would have). If you offer a small premium of say 10% investors might just think there is a better deal out there. Consequently the market value of the company may jump by 15% forcing you to make a new offer of 20% which the market still doesn't accept etc.. until you finally reach a negotiated price. From the numbers side of things this looks better for the buyer because you may end up with a lower buying price. However this way of buying a company takes time and is very messy, giving competitors room to organize to make competing bids or convince the board to split of specific parts of the company.

Adding to the normal premiums are the current market conditions and the vast sums of liquid assets large tech companies are sitting on. Firstly the general market is down which usually means shares of healthy companies are "undervalued" (difficult to tell if they really are, but that's the consensus). Secondly liquid assets are "expensive" to own at the moment, some banks are charging negative interest on large deposits and bonds are sitting at around 0%. If you're a tech company sitting on huge piles of cash this means you want to spend that money on anything as long as it gives more than 0% interest. Shareholders know that companies have a lot of money to spend so they can demand very high premiums.

Google bought Motorola mobility at a 63% premium so HP buying at 79% isn't all that strange. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple and Microsoft aren't also considering some big takeovers (GIGAOM reported that microsoft was also considering buyingMotorola) because this is the time to get get rid of those big piles of money they have.

Post reply on HN