31–40 of 63 posts
Dude, it's just a javascript library. And a pretty damn good one. I think you guys might be a little too uptight..
I guess to appease the technical crowd, they should have the technical specs and full API docs on the front page...
Shockingly disgusting... I'm incredibly embarrassed, imagine trying to convince your boss that you should be using jQuery.
Shockingly disgusting... I'm incredibly embarrassed, imagine trying to convince your boss that you should be using jQuery.
Oh, the melodrama. Well, I love it. Sure, the "rock star" thing is a little edgy and not to everyone's taste, but with the comments here, you'd think the design were truly bad. It's not. It's worthwhile to distinguish between designs that are not to your aesthetic and designs that are poorly executed.
The site re-design makes jQuery look more complete, like an actual product that is ready to be used and I think that's what they were aiming for. The rockstar thing, kind of lame but I'm sure you guys can live. (Especailly with the links to Google, IBM, etc right under it)
Dude, it's just a javascript library. And a pretty damn good one. I think you guys might be a little too uptight..
Not to mention it's actually fun to work with.
Against most opinions I love it. Why do code/opensource/... sites had such a serious designs?. I think JQuery site design is great, it will take a while to get used to it but surely others will follow. (In any case, what we have to really care is about the library itself)