Earlier quoted context omitted.
and in doing so, set themselves up for much larger failure. Google instead pivoted that energy into cloud, which is now broken out in their earnings. I was one of those googlers who, when Plus was announced, wondered "why aren't we announcing an AWS competitor?"
What makes you think it was the same people inside Google that did social instead of cloud computing, and that was the choice going through leadership? Google can walk and chew gum at the same time.
As I recall from my outside/user perspective: Google Plus pretty much co-opted the entire organization in an supposed "all hands on deck, existential fight" against Facebook. Every product and feature had to have a "social" layer (including GMail!); YouTube even adopted a "Real Name" policy but still amazingly managed to worsen the comment system.
Can you imagine what a similar level of effort on the cloud would have produced? Maybe they wouldn't be a distant #3 in that space today.