PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
morepypy.blogspot.com
PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
1–10 of 57 posts
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#2Is this via ctypes, or "real" support in much the same as how CPython would behave?
I ask because this is one of the features that I've been waiting (impatiently) for - I've run some Flask projects using PyPy and gunicorn, and love how fast it goes, but really want to be able to use the rest of my codebase, which unfortunately does rely on some C (and Cython) extensions. (:
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#3Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#4I wish something similar could be developed for Ruby.
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#5In general I'm very happy with my choice of Ruby/Rails instead of Python/Django, but PyPy is one of the few things I envy Python developers for. I wish something similar could be developed for Ruby.
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#6> has beta level support for loading CPython C extensions. Is this via ctypes, or "real" support in much the same as how CPython would behave? I ask because this is one of the features that I've been waiting (impatiently) for - I've run some Flask projects using PyPy and gunicorn, and love how fast it goes, but really want to be able to use the rest of my codebase, which unfortunately does rely on some C (and Cython)…
If there's a pure-Python version of the C extension, it might be faster on PyPy than the C extension support that cpyext (PyPy C-API compatibility module) provides.
Cython-based code is currently incompatible (it goes well beyond the public C-API), but a GSoC project to generate ctypes-based pure-Python code from Cython is (was?) going on.
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#7> has beta level support for loading CPython C extensions. Is this via ctypes, or "real" support in much the same as how CPython would behave? I ask because this is one of the features that I've been waiting (impatiently) for - I've run some Flask projects using PyPy and gunicorn, and love how fast it goes, but really want to be able to use the rest of my codebase, which unfortunately does rely on some C (and Cython)…
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#8In general I'm very happy with my choice of Ruby/Rails instead of Python/Django, but PyPy is one of the few things I envy Python developers for. I wish something similar could be developed for Ruby.
Also, this could be an interesting read: http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/making-ruby-fast-the-rub...
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#9In general I'm very happy with my choice of Ruby/Rails instead of Python/Django, but PyPy is one of the few things I envy Python developers for. I wish something similar could be developed for Ruby.
Depending on your needs, there are others - numpy, scipy, matplotlib, nltk, gevent.
> I wish something similar could be developed for Ruby.
Isn't http://rubini.us/ supposed to be the PyPy for Ruby? It's not complete, but then neither is PyPy.
Re: PyPy 1.6 Released - Full Python 2.7.1 Implementation
#10In general I'm very happy with my choice of Ruby/Rails instead of Python/Django, but PyPy is one of the few things I envy Python developers for. I wish something similar could be developed for Ruby.
> but PyPy is one of the few things I envy Python developers for. Depending on your needs, there are others - numpy, scipy, matplotlib, nltk, gevent. > I wish something similar could be developed for Ruby. Isn't http://rubini.us/ supposed to be the PyPy for Ruby? It's not complete, but then neither is PyPy.