Live data from Hacker News

The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

doi.apa.org

21–30 of 284 posts

Re: The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

#21
post #9

As someone in a leadership role is it more important to keep the camera on?

Most people at our company just have their camera on for the start of the meeting and then drop off as the meeting progresses. As long as you cam up for the first 3-5 minutes, no one really cares.

Re: The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

#22

I haven't turned my camera on in meetings for over 8 months, I don't think anyone really cares that much, and I find some people like it because they feel less pressure to keep their own cameras on as a result. That's been my experience at least, I'm sure some people have bosses that require it for whatever reason which might make that not an option for everyone.

Based on a discussion here several months ago, it seems to vary by workplace. Some companies rarely use cameras, some use them all the time.

Very grateful I work for the former.

Re: The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

#25
> following a day of virtual meetings

I've done full days of real meetings. Those were exhausting and very draining. I'm surprised that anybody would expect anything different from virtual meetings.

I have noticed that it's harder to feel people as fully human when they're little 2D movies. Even moreso when they're disembodied voices.

It's less so when I've met the people IRL. I'm guessing I can then link their image or voice to the human I know.

In my experience, there's also far less participation when everybody has their camera off.

Re: The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

#26
I found out early on on that meetings are much less fatiguing if I’m not looking at the web meeting app at all i.e. I have some document/code on my screen instead. If there is screen sharing involved so I have to look a the web meeting screen, I go full screen and minimise all their video streams which a) gets me more screen real estate, b) means it effectively becomes an audio only meeting at that point.

We used to have a shortage of meeting rooms when having them physically and locally. This was great as it meant they naturally spread out over the week. Nowadays folk think they can get you to hop on a virtual meeting room in minutes regardless of what you’re doing.

I’m very good at declining meetings where I think I’ll not be offering much value giving a reason why. I find quite often people want me in because they think I’ll enjoy it, or don’t want me out of the loop. They can summarise after by email if that’s all they want.

Re: The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

#27
To make a different point than all the camera naysayers so far:

I I'd be WFH for two years during covid, and everyone had their cameras off, I'd go crazy. Not seeing a face for months, being stressed about the other party in a meeting not even paying attention, just speaking into a void etc.

Re: The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

#28
I find camera use exhausting. It feels considerably more demanding and awkward than meeting IRL. There are many benefits to working from home but avoiding endless meetings is still not one of them. I attribute it to all those years working at an office, which have made many people frustratingly bad at written communication and asynchronous work.

Re: The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings

#29

I haven't turned my camera on in meetings for over 8 months, I don't think anyone really cares that much, and I find some people like it because they feel less pressure to keep their own cameras on as a result. That's been my experience at least, I'm sure some people have bosses that require it for whatever reason which might make that not an option for everyone.

They care, they just don't want to pick a fight. They might judge you and believe the reason you're not on camera is because you're busy doing something else.
Post reply on HN