Earlier quoted context omitted.
The WHO/CDC positions are consistent with the prevailing science. If someone went on YouTube to articulate the current scientific consensus of Ivermectin, which is that "There is no evidence to support it as a therapy for COVID, but that there are currently studies in progress which could yield important information, and in the meantime, people should definitely not be taking it as it can be dangerous unless administ…
> The WHO/CDC positions are consistent with the prevailing science. Aren’t these the organizations that lied to the public in March 2020, saying masks were not effective? They later justified their deception, at the cost of how many lives (?), by suggesting it was to prevent a shortage of masks for medical personnel. These organizations are not promoting the science to shape policy, they’re promoting policy with filt…
A simpler explanation, that is consistent with data, is that community masking was never very effective, and that the current mask guidelines are 100% about politics and signaling.