Live data from Hacker News

Groupon has no viable business model

blogs.hbr.org

91–100 of 129 posts

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#91

It's almost as if people derive personal satisfaction from poking holes in Groupon's success (or any startup, for that matter). Groupon has no viable business model, people will get tired of Zynga's games, Twitter can't monetize, Facebook will be killed by Google+/is useless/the ads on it aren't worth anything, etc. Every time one of these things gets pointed out, people show up and start high-fiving each other, say…

Groupon is exploiting small businesses. This has nothing to do with jealousy and has everything to do with what's right and what's wrong.

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#94

It's almost as if people derive personal satisfaction from poking holes in Groupon's success (or any startup, for that matter). Groupon has no viable business model, people will get tired of Zynga's games, Twitter can't monetize, Facebook will be killed by Google+/is useless/the ads on it aren't worth anything, etc. Every time one of these things gets pointed out, people show up and start high-fiving each other, say…

Nobody likes a winner...

But, to be fair, if groupon can't turn a profit on 800 million dollars+ of revenue, they may have a problem.

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#95
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disclaimer: I work for a sustainable deal site for local businesses. One factor that hbr is not mentioning is business owners (national and local) that participate on Groupon, for the most part, are having bad experiences. Obviously this depends on the industry (sky dive plus all around, coffee shops down all around) but not all industries can live off of 25% of their goods sold. I know many local business owners who…

If you don't mind me asking, who do you work for and what makes the deal site sustainable for local businesses?

Sustainable means it doesn't hinder the business like a 50% off coupon and a 25% split on the revenue thereafter.

Most local businesses cant afford that and realize it too late.

The company I work for is thegolocalcard.com (won't plug it again on Hacker News...I promise).

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#96
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disclaimer: I work for a sustainable deal site for local businesses. One factor that hbr is not mentioning is business owners (national and local) that participate on Groupon, for the most part, are having bad experiences. Obviously this depends on the industry (sky dive plus all around, coffee shops down all around) but not all industries can live off of 25% of their goods sold. I know many local business owners who…

> business owners (national and local) that participate on Groupon, for the most part, are having bad experiences My understanding is that Groupon's satisfaction rate is well above 50%. It seems that everyone forgets that, at worst, this is an advertising expense that guarantees revenue and foot traffic.

It is 100% dependant on industry. Ask any retailer if a Groupon makes sense when they depend on the margins their products produce.

The only way it makes sense is if they are able to get large volume discounts on whatever they are trying to sell.

Just running some #s here. Local clothing ship buys jewelry for $5/piece and marks it up to $15. Groupon takes 75% of the $15. Groupon takes $11.25 out of the $15 and you just lost $.25 on the entire deal (not including expenses to find that piece).

Sure that same retailer could mark the piece up to $20 but groupon takes $15 of that and you break even. A $5 piece probably couldnt be sold for anything higher than $20...

I will agree that it generates foot traffic but most smaller businesses I have talked to who have done a Groupon or thought about it have had negative experiences or choose not to do it because of a scenario similar to the one above I portrayed.

Just my .02

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#97

It's almost as if people derive personal satisfaction from poking holes in Groupon's success (or any startup, for that matter). Groupon has no viable business model, people will get tired of Zynga's games, Twitter can't monetize, Facebook will be killed by Google+/is useless/the ads on it aren't worth anything, etc. Every time one of these things gets pointed out, people show up and start high-fiving each other, say…

[deleted]

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#98
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is simply not true that a "great deal" will get publicized by itself, or that any pre-2009 channel for publicizing great deals was effective for most businesses. I find this comment facile. Small businesses die all the time because nobody discovers them. I don't know about Groupon, but it's flat out wrong to say that small businesses don't have the problem Groupon claims be addressing. They clearly do have the pro…

> It is simply not true that a "great deal" will get publicized by itself I said spend five minutes emailing. If I'm selling widgets for $25 when the usual, accepted price in commerce is $100 (which is the standard Groupon deal, right?) and I spend five minutes emailing the widget fanatics mailing list, I guarantee that a LOT of people will discover my offer to sell widgets for $25. The deal will spread all by itself…

Repeating the same wrong statement doesn't make it more true. You can make the absolute best cupcake in Chicago, but if you don't promote your business, it won't matter how far you discount them. Nobody's going to know you exist.

People persist in these weird economic analyses of "daily deals" sites as if they have anything to do with the economics of breakage or marginal cost. That's not the point of daily deals. The point of daily deals sites is that they're promotional channels, and that they're more effective than local advertising, which is a notorious black hole.

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#99

It's almost as if people derive personal satisfaction from poking holes in Groupon's success (or any startup, for that matter). Groupon has no viable business model, people will get tired of Zynga's games, Twitter can't monetize, Facebook will be killed by Google+/is useless/the ads on it aren't worth anything, etc. Every time one of these things gets pointed out, people show up and start high-fiving each other, say…

Really?

The satisfaction is that Groupon was using some pretty weird accounting measures to claim profitability, but was backed down to use usual accounting measures, which show they are scarily in the red.

The vast amount of advertising they've done probably didn't endear them to geeks, either.

Re: Groupon has no viable business model

#100

The viable business model for Groupon is to shed 90% of it's 7500 employees, improve business satisfaction and let the businesses come to them. This may be hard now that Groupon has such a bad reputation amongst businesses. Groupon was too enthusiastic to become big rather than good. I understand why they thought it was necessary and to some degree I agree that it was the correct game to play but I think they have de…

let the businesses come to them That will never happen. That's the fundamental problem with "local". Small businesses and mom-and-pop shops need to be called and convinced. They need their hand held. They aren't studying lean marketing practices or split testing their offers. Look at the head counts for ad sales vs editorial for any local publication (newspaper, magazine, newsletter). If you want to sell to local bus…

I don't bite. Sure it's difficult, but if Groupon was a good experience for the business then it would sell its self. Groupon wouldn't be the $6 Billion monster it is today but at least they might be making some money.
Post reply on HN