Live data from Hacker News

No Server Required - Jekyll & Amazon S3

allthingsdistributed.com

1–10 of 39 posts

Re: No Server Required - Jekyll & Amazon S3

#3
post #2

Except for the servers at Disqus which are running the comment system. And the servers serving up the static HTML pages.

Aha! That's how he did it. I couldn't figure out how commenting worked. He does have a comment count link at the top of the page. Is that fragment from Disqus also?

Re: No Server Required - Jekyll & Amazon S3

#5
post #3
post #2

Except for the servers at Disqus which are running the comment system. And the servers serving up the static HTML pages.

Aha! That's how he did it. I couldn't figure out how commenting worked. He does have a comment count link at the top of the page. Is that fragment from Disqus also?

A simple inspection of the source reveals that it is also an embeded javascript file from Disqus.

Re: No Server Required - Jekyll & Amazon S3

#10
post #9

I remember running this type of setup back in 2003 with text files and Blosxom. What's old is new again?

This is more about the S3 part than the jekyll one.

But yes, I guess there is some movement back in time. I'd say the two main reasons are a return to more minimal blogging (i.e. something like tumblr as opposed to blogrolls, widgets, plugins etc.), and the fact that you can do some dynamic stuff in the client now via JavaScript (e.g. comments with Disqus).

Post reply on HN