Earlier quoted context omitted.
Link to your site? :)
http://iconfinder.com
The 50 Best Websites of 2011
71–80 of 106 posts
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#72Congrats to DDG but wow Time has the worst navigation I've ever seen for a collection. Where am I currently in that list? Where is the entire list? How do I start over? Go to the end? Why does it do full page reloads for every click?
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#73I'm sure Gabriel will pass by here at some point so I want to ask a question: do you find that going into an industry where you have absolutely no "first mover" advantage, where several others are already "doing it better" and where those you're competing against are so insanely "better resourced" than you daunting or comforting? I guess what I'm trying to learn from you is what your mental state is like on a day to…
However, I got into it out of pure interest with no original intention/particular belief that it would get this far. Now though, I believe we have an established long-term vision and are executing on it.
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#74How many of you are using it as your default search engine? I am. I don't think it's as good as Google, but I think it's good enough, some things are useful, like the quick links, and at least the user interface is cleaner, there is no stupid auto-complete etc.
I did for a while and loved the bang searches like everyone else, but I missed the speed of Google searches -- so I eventually went back. Yes, it's a relatively silly quibble, but that second or two more of loading feels pretty significant.
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do for now, but its match failures (especially on computers-related stuff) is making me consider switching back to google more every day. Match results really are much lower quality than on google. > there is no stupid auto-complete That's really something I don't care about, since I never search directly from the site, always from my browser.
Same here. I have it set as my primary search engine for months how but recently noticed that I am more often than not already add the !s or !g to get Google results instead when entering my terms in the address bar. One of my biggest gripes is probably that it will only display one result per domain unless you restrict a search solely to that domain. And it often shows not the most relevant or logical result for a q…
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#76Congrats to DDG but wow Time has the worst navigation I've ever seen for a collection. Where am I currently in that list? Where is the entire list? How do I start over? Go to the end? Why does it do full page reloads for every click?
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
The best reason for me is the quality. Between the disambiguation feature and the lack of spam and crappy sites, DDG is really good at finding what you want it to.
In some domains. Whenever I give it a go, as soon as I turn to work it fails me (work is math for me).
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey, Tim. The headline should really be changed to something neutral. YC startups already get tons of free press and PR by virtue that their investor controls HN. I thought it would be nice to highlight another founder's startup as well. To explain, the original title of the post was "Duck Duck Go makes Time Magazine's top 50 sites of the year" Personally, I feel that Gabriel contributes more to HN content and startu…
"Personally, I feel that Gabriel contributes more to HN content and startup culture than the AirBnb, Hipmunk or Instapaper founders combined." ...and you're obviously free to express your opinion in the thread. But it's never been fair game to editorialize the headlines on story submissions here. (And for what it's worth, I think it was a fairly classy move that the editor didn't change the link/headline to emphasize…
I don't understand your comment about editorializing headlines. The process of editorializing is making changes after the copy has been submitted. And, that's what happened to both the headline and original url that I submitted.
I submitted a link to this url[1] via bookmarklet. I trimmed extra headline cruft, and clicked "submit". The community upvoted it to #1, after you posted your comment, an unknown mod changed/editorialized the headline to remove references to DDG, and changed the url to this[2], which is pretty crap content IMHO, that I would never submit. I don't get that.
I'll stop this meta discussion, because it's really not that productive and uninteresting.
ref:
[1] http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2...
[2] http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/0,28757,2087815,0...
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#79Congrats to DDG but wow Time has the worst navigation I've ever seen for a collection. Where am I currently in that list? Where is the entire list? How do I start over? Go to the end? Why does it do full page reloads for every click?
Just the links & titles : http://pastebin.com/HmtPif1c
Re: The 50 Best Websites of 2011
#80I've heard a lot of about duckduckgo on here and on reddit. Are there actual compelling reasons to use this service over google? Is the only reason their privacy policy? I saw a commenter on the linked site state that duckduckgo is great for programming, what does this mean?
These are the things I use daily that I find the most useful: Lots of nice zero-click goodies: * StackOverflow integration: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=remove+directory+symlink (can also search directly with !so) * IP Address: http://duckduckgo.com/?q=ip * Common symbol tables: http://duckduckgo.com/?q=ascii+table http://duckduckgo.com/?q=html+entities * Wolfram Alpha integration: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=d%28cos%28x^…