Here is a potentially dumb idea: Before someone can declare candidacy for a public office, they should pass an exam that tests them on general and basic knowledge on a wide variety of topics that proves that the person has some level of general awareness of tech that is so ubiquitous.
Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
11–20 of 564 posts
Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#12Here is a potentially dumb idea: Before someone can declare candidacy for a public office, they should pass an exam that tests them on general and basic knowledge on a wide variety of topics that proves that the person has some level of general awareness of tech that is so ubiquitous.
That means that the Governor is either persisting despite knowing better, or is remaining deliberately ignorant despite the expertise at his disposal. Either way, this is at least somewhat intentional.
Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#13I find the article title kind of curious, given that it states Parson has "doubled down" which suggests that the video the article references is an active effort on Parson's part. It then goes on to state that the video was produced by a PAC Parson created but doesn't give direct input to. Comes off as unnecessarily inflammatory to me I suppose. Having said that, this situation in particular really tests my willingne…
I would not be surprised if that is the case. Or if he does have such a person he is only hearing what he wants to hear.
Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#14Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#15Here is a potentially dumb idea: Before someone can declare candidacy for a public office, they should pass an exam that tests them on general and basic knowledge on a wide variety of topics that proves that the person has some level of general awareness of tech that is so ubiquitous.
This sort of thing was used in the past to keep Black people from voting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test#Voting
Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#16Here is a potentially dumb idea: Before someone can declare candidacy for a public office, they should pass an exam that tests them on general and basic knowledge on a wide variety of topics that proves that the person has some level of general awareness of tech that is so ubiquitous.
This sort of thing was used in the past to keep Black people from voting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test#Voting
Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#17Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#18This is what newspapers are supposed to do innit?
Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#19Here is a potentially dumb idea: Before someone can declare candidacy for a public office, they should pass an exam that tests them on general and basic knowledge on a wide variety of topics that proves that the person has some level of general awareness of tech that is so ubiquitous.
Your proposal suggests that this result is due to lack of knowledge, rather than malice. While I'm a fan of Hanlon's Razor in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Governor's office clearly employs technologically competent people. That means that the Governor is either persisting despite knowing better, or is remaining deliberately ignorant despite the expertise at his disposal. Either way, this is at least s…
I suspect it's a mix of both.
Re: Gov Parson pushes to prosecute reporter who found security flaw in state site
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
This sort of thing was used in the past to keep Black people from voting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test#Voting
The OP is saying the test is for holding office, not voting. There absolutely should be a higher bar for holding office than for voting.
I am sure the OP's suggestion was in good faith, just that they weren't aware of some of the history and potential repercussions.