Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: vGPU and SR-IOV on consumer GPUs

arccompute.com

1–10 of 82 posts

Re: Show HN: vGPU and SR-IOV on consumer GPUs

#6
This is insanely impressive. Having tried set up GPU passthrough in proxmox a few years ago, it was an absolute disaster. I would love to see this kind of approach more widely supported by other hypervisors!

It's a real shame consumer GPUs are arbitrary locked down when the enterprise counterparts (often with the exact same chip) have much better support for virtualization.

Re: Show HN: vGPU and SR-IOV on consumer GPUs

#7
post #6

This is insanely impressive. Having tried set up GPU passthrough in proxmox a few years ago, it was an absolute disaster. I would love to see this kind of approach more widely supported by other hypervisors! It's a real shame consumer GPUs are arbitrary locked down when the enterprise counterparts (often with the exact same chip) have much better support for virtualization.

The enterprise versions of these products have a lot of bugs and gotchas because so few use the feature.

Re: Show HN: vGPU and SR-IOV on consumer GPUs

#8
post #3

Note Intel GVT-g is only available on <=Gen9 GPU's. Gen11 and 12 are not supported.

GVT-G has hard resolution limitations and was never stable with QEMU on Linux

GVT-g uses KVMgt. Intel has not yet upstreamed their patches.

Re: Show HN: vGPU and SR-IOV on consumer GPUs

#9
Great! Still requires vGPU support and the merged driver approach last time I tried won't support CUDA on host (I was probably the first one tried the merged driver thing with vgpu_unlocked?).

Looking forward someone write a Vulkan driver on Windows that just shuttles down to the Linux host. virgl used to be a promising project ...

Post reply on HN