Live data from Hacker News

Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

theconversation.com

11–20 of 297 posts

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#11
post #7

I don’t know… my Nextdoor group is pretty abusive to certain groups at times, and people post happily with their real life name and the rough area of where they live attached. Hate towards an individual person isn’t super common, but it happens. If this extrapolates, I can’t see removing anonymity doing much other than e.g. hurting LGBT groups online (imagine asking questions as a member of that group in a conservati…

Yes, this is the conclusion of the article as well.

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#12

moot (Chris Poole) Conjecture: bind anonymity to ephemerality for best results. Consider ten seconds persistence limit. Like short-term memory for the spoken word.

Yeah, Moot's legacy sure has been doing the world a lot of favors. You sure we should be referencing his logic?

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#13

totally agree, cyber-bullying is mostly due to anonymity, and technology is well developed, and hackers find their way to do heinous acts and hide behind, this type of abuse cannot simply be prevented by banning social media, the cause is deep within the society's roots.

The actual solution is to limit your social media use unless you want to be subject to abuse. I only have my Facebook for friends to contact me via messenger. As well as it's original purpose, commenting on a ( real life )friend's engagement photos with a nice congrats. The moment you get into stuff The Facebook wasn't designed for; like actually meeting new people, arguing with strangers, etc , then you run into pro…

Wouldn’t that be more easily achieved by building in some limits? Not sure how it’d look.

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#14
The article cites the recent murder of politician David Amess as the purpose for revisiting discussions about banning anonymity on social networks.

But Amess was stabbed to death by a Somali migrant with ‘religious and ideological motivations’. What does that have to do with social media anonymity?

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#17

moot (Chris Poole) Conjecture: bind anonymity to ephemerality for best results. Consider ten seconds persistence limit. Like short-term memory for the spoken word.

If anything, he has proven that it brings out the absolutely worst.

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#18
post #14

The article cites the recent murder of politician David Amess as the purpose for revisiting discussions about banning anonymity on social networks. But Amess was stabbed to death by a Somali migrant with ‘religious and ideological motivations’. What does that have to do with social media anonymity?

Nothing. They simply continue to propagate the surveillance state.

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#19

moot (Chris Poole) Conjecture: bind anonymity to ephemerality for best results. Consider ten seconds persistence limit. Like short-term memory for the spoken word.

Yeah, Moot's legacy sure has been doing the world a lot of favors. You sure we should be referencing his logic?

I’d choose a world with his legacy over Zuck’s ten times out of ten.

Re: Online abuse: banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer

#20

moot (Chris Poole) Conjecture: bind anonymity to ephemerality for best results. Consider ten seconds persistence limit. Like short-term memory for the spoken word.

Yeah, Moot's legacy sure has been doing the world a lot of favors. You sure we should be referencing his logic?

4chan and the MSM are both despicable slime pits in their own ways, but 4chan is much more honest. If the corporate media decides some subject is taboo, or that some line of inquiry is banned in order to protect advertisers' profit, you'll still be able to find extremely strong signal about those topics on 4chan.
Post reply on HN