COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
1–10 of 63 posts
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#2I've had the influenza vaccine every year with no side effects.
3 weeks of chest pains on the 1st Pfizer (+emergency visit) and 1 week of chest pains on the 2nd Pfizer. ECG, x-ray and blood tests normal. Four different doctors: "we don't know what the side effect is, can't diagnose it, and we're seeing it quite often". Yeah that was concerning.
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#3It's pretty wild that prior to vaccination, smallpox prevention was done by inoculation with actual live smallpox. That story of Washington forcing his troops to be 'vaccinated' is wrong - he exposed them to actual smallpox. Something like 1% of people receiving inoculation would develop full-blown smallpox. No vaccine courts for those folks.
There are going to be a lot of one in a million coincidences with this broad of a vaccination campaign - a lot of people who were going to develop blood clots for unrelated reasons are going to coincidentally get them after getting vaccinated. Same goes for myocarditis - vaccination can cause it in rare cases, but so can adenovirus, herpes, hepatitis, various bacteria, parasites, and fungi. There are going to be a lot of coincidences at this scale so it's important that they're carefully reviewed by the court so the covid vaccine isn't wrongly tarred, especially now when misinformation will make several laps around the world before the facts can get their pants on.
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#4where is the recourse for those who suffer from covid due to negligence of others?
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#52.2M+ adverse reactions in the WHO database. Of course Google, the corporate press, and "independent fact checkers" are saying it lacks context.
Most people I know, know at least a few people that had adverse reactions already; let alone ADE or long-term consequences.
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#6I apologize for going out on a tangent, but I jus have to draw some attention to this quote from the article:
> McFadden, 44, said she was previously healthy and needed two emergency surgeries to remove massive clots in her lungs, heart and left leg. She spent nine days in the hospital, racking up $489,153 in medical bills, she said.
Seriously, US of A. What the hell is this? How is this even possible?
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#7where is the recourse for those who suffer from covid due to negligence of others?
When I've been sick in the past I've often thought that it would be nice to have recourse against the people who infected me.
This is life though. It's not practical, moral, or enforceable.
The best thing one can do is put effort into the factors they can control—diet, exercise, avoiding unnecessary conflict to keep stress low, etc.
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#8I apologize for going out on a tangent, but I jus have to draw some attention to this quote from the article: > McFadden, 44, said she was previously healthy and needed two emergency surgeries to remove massive clots in her lungs, heart and left leg. She spent nine days in the hospital, racking up $489,153 in medical bills, she said. Seriously, US of A. What the hell is this? How is this even possible?
The invisible hand guiding our healthcare system has an unfortunate tendency to reach into your pocket and leave you bankrupt.
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#92.2M+ adverse reactions in the WHO database. Of course Google, the corporate press, and "independent fact checkers" are saying it lacks context. Most people I know, know at least a few people that had adverse reactions already; let alone ADE or long-term consequences. http://www.vigiaccess.org/
The WHO essentially says it lacks context. Read the "Important points to consider" heading in your link.
Namely "VigiAccess cannot be used to infer any confirmed link between a suspected side effect and any specific medicine."
Re: COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lacking for those harmed
#10https://investinganswers.com/articles/10-most-popular-stocks...
Top stock owned by members of congress -
Pfizer #6
Johnson and Johnson #7
Moderna stock up 387% YoY: https://investinganswers.com/articles/10-most-popular-stocks...
Bill Gates invested $55million into BioNTech in October 2019: https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-det...
Why are people with COVID antibodies from successful recovery forced to get vaccines? Why are children when COVID presents no risk to them?