Live data from Hacker News

Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

browser.geekbench.com

71–80 of 917 posts

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#71
post #39

Where is the graphics test? The M1 Max versus an NVIDIA 3080 or similar?

I'm waiting to be corrected by someone who knows GPU architecture better than me but as far as I can tell the synthetic benchmarks can trade blows with a 3070 or 80 (mobile), but the actual gaming performance isn't going to be as rosy. Also recall that very few games needing that performance actually work on MacOS

Does someone know how much VRAM the M1X has? Because I bet it's far less than a 3070 or 3080.

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#72
post #16

Wow does much better than Geekbench's prior top processor ( https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks ) the Intel Core i9-11900K ( https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/intel-core-i9-11900... ). 10,997 for Intel i9 vs 12,693 for M1 Max

I wish there were laptop-specific Geekbench rankings because right now it seems impossible to easily compare devices in the same class

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#73

I'm in the situation where I really want to pre-order a 14", but I have no idea if going with the base model would be a mistake. Would upgrading to 32GB RAM make Xcode faster? Or would it be a waste of $400?

Unlikely to make Xcode any faster. Just look at your ram usage now and then forecast a bit to know.

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#74
post #57
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Impressive but unbelievably expensive considering what will actually be run on it. I kind of want one, but the 5800x for example is about 10x less expensive than a specced out MacBook Pro

People are probably going to be reading your comparison as an objective comparison rather than an opportunistic one. For example, if you are choosing between upgrading AM4 processors on your desktop versus buying a new Macbook Pro, then of course it makes sense to compare the cost in those terms. However, the price of the M1 chip is obviously probably not that bad. Since you can’t meaningfully buy it on its own, I gu…

The M1 chip is actually probably extremely expensive. The top of the line one is literally 60 BILLION transistors!

My current machine has like 10 billion (GPU + CPU)

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#75
post #48

Pretty impressive, all things considered. Looks like it's roughly on par with an AMD 5800X, which is a Desktop CPU with 8C/16T and a 105W TDP.

5800x seems 20% faster for single core: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5874365 so def not on part.

That's certainly overclocked or very high PBO offsets, at stock the 5800x gets around 1700-1800 ST.

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#76
post #52

Where is the graphics test? The M1 Max versus an NVIDIA 3080 or similar?

It's probably bad, the M1 could not get 60fps on WoW so ... When I see Apple comparison I would take that with a grain of salts because the M1 is not able to run any modern game at decent fps.

My M1 cannot properly without stuttering show https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro-14-and-16/ (esp. the second animation of opening and turning the laptop).

Both safari and chrome

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#77
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's probably bad, the M1 could not get 60fps on WoW so ... When I see Apple comparison I would take that with a grain of salts because the M1 is not able to run any modern game at decent fps.

"the M1 is not able to run any modern game at decent fps." Do you have first hand experience with this? I do . We play WoW on MacBook air M1 and it runs fantastic . Better than my intel MacBook Pro from 2019

"Running fantastic" is what Apple would advertise, but what matters is fps, utilisation and thermals when benchmarking games

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#78
post #36

Pretty impressive, all things considered. Looks like it's roughly on par with an AMD 5800X, which is a Desktop CPU with 8C/16T and a 105W TDP.

Impressive but unbelievably expensive considering what will actually be run on it. I kind of want one, but the 5800x for example is about 10x less expensive than a specced out MacBook Pro

Workstation laptops are expensive. These new Macs are priced quite competitively. E.g. the 14“ with the full M1 Pro is $2.5k and is faster, more portable and has a much better display than a 2.7k Dell Precision 5560…

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Per core performance is the most interesting metric. Edit: for relative comparison between CPUs, per core metric is the most interesting unless you also account for heat, price and many other factors. Comparing a 56-core CPU with 10-core M1 is a meaningless comparison.

Not when building large software projects.

What compiler could even make use of 10 cores? Most build processes I've run can't even fully utilize the 4 cores.

Re: Apple M1 Max Geekbench Score

#80

I'm in the situation where I really want to pre-order a 14", but I have no idea if going with the base model would be a mistake. Would upgrading to 32GB RAM make Xcode faster? Or would it be a waste of $400?

16GB of RAM seems so low in 2021. OTOH, hard drives are so fast on these things that maybe 16 is good enough with the SSD as overflow. I ended up shelling out the extra $400 for 32GB, but didn't feel great about it!

On the other hand I've been running 16GB of ram for a while and I can't conceive of a reason why I would need more. 32GB seems like overkill. What would you do with all of that ram? Open more tabs?
Post reply on HN