11–19 of 19 posts
* For engineering: working in the simplest language that can be mastered by children * For STEM education: studying an engineering language that can be used to work in the future * For data science: communicating with engineers in the same language
It's very hard to compete with the momentum Python has on each of these points.
Why not write python and transpile to Go? Py2many, grumpy etc can do this.
Same audience as https://julialang.org/ it would seem.
A list comprehension seems way more complicated for a child than a for loop. And even for a professional developer, one hides a lot of steps, the other one lists all of them
A list comprehension seems way more complicated for a child than a for loop. And even for a professional developer, one hides a lot of steps, the other one lists all of them
Agree. And there is spx - A Go+ 2D Game Engine for STEM education - https://github.com/goplus/spx
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agree. And there is spx - A Go+ 2D Game Engine for STEM education - https://github.com/goplus/spx
My comment was a bit incomplete, my point is "I'm not sure specifying the type is more complex than a list comprehension". Almost like the language is focusing on "complex visually" rather than focusing on making the features of the language simple