Combination of 401k growth, having a six figure income, cryptocurrency investments, and early investment in AMD and TSLA and a few side income streams.
Sounds like you owe your success more to WallStreetBets than hacking.
I wonder what the reasoning for open sourcing it now. And why not from the get go instead of decades later. Licence choices are obviously up to the authors. But at this point it is more a museum relic than anything practical
The rights to L0phtCrack were purchased about a year ago by a company that made password cracking rigs for large companies to audit their employees passwords. They filed bankruptcy due to the GPU shortage changing their COGS overnight. When payments stopped being made the license reverted back to the author and he open sourced it.
L0phtCrack was featured in the Phrack Magazine (53) inside an article written by Aleph1 on attacking PPTP, one of the oldest VPN protocols [1]. Prior to that, Aleph1 has written arguably the most famous article in Phrack Magazine (49) to date [2]. [1] The Crumbling Tunnel: http://phrack.org/issues/53/12.html [2] Smashing The Stack For Fun And Profit: http://phrack.org/issues/49/14.html
Aleph1 has written arguably the most famous article in Phrack Magazine
Given the number of people, including myself, who consider reading that article a truly formative experiences, you might argue it's one of the most famous/influential articles in programming.
I have been following programming and technology for decades and I had never heard of it. Every project should have a concise (one or two sentence) description in the GitHub README and the website's homepage. Even the most well-known tools.
I agree they should have a description in the readme, as a courtesy if nothing else. But L0phtCrack is a very well known tool. If you've never heard of it and have been following security stuff for decades, that's really on you.
What do you mean by "that's really on you"? I'd normally interpret it as something like... "this is a state of affairs that would be different if you'd acted differently, and you knew or could have been able to know this in advance". Along those lines, anyway. But not having heard about a tool doesn't really seem to fit that.
But which ones are really setup by the NSA to get said evidence that will be inconvenient for him at some point in the future? (I suspect Tor, and at least a few of the commercial VPN providers)
Some recent news out of the commercial VPN universe... From a cryptographer professor at Johns Hopkins: https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/14493567426896896... Kape, an Israeli 'adware' company that renamed itself to distance itself from its prior history as an adware company, recently bought up ExpressVPN and several other services and rebranded itself as a VPN services company. Kape also bought VPN ranking…
The CryptoAG story is super interesting for seeing how super powers handle the issue, thx for the wikipedia.
> L0phtCrack is a password auditing and recovery application originally produced by Mudge from L0pht Heavy Industries. It is used to test password strength and sometimes to recover lost Microsoft Windows passwords, by using dictionary, brute-force, hybrid attacks, and rainbow tables. - Wikipedia