Live data from Hacker News

L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

l0phtcrack.gitlab.io

31–40 of 151 posts

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#31
post #18

> L0phtCrack is a password auditing and recovery application originally produced by Mudge from L0pht Heavy Industries. It is used to test password strength and sometimes to recover lost Microsoft Windows passwords, by using dictionary, brute-force, hybrid attacks, and rainbow tables. - Wikipedia

Thanks. Wonder why they can't put a description on the GitHub page?

Yeah, the repos don’t even have a useful README, at least to understand whatever the software does…

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#32
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks. Wonder why they can't put a description on the GitHub page?

Yeah, the repos don’t even have a useful README, at least to understand whatever the software does…

It’s a widely known password auditing tool that’s been around for 24 years.

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#33
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, the repos don’t even have a useful README, at least to understand whatever the software does…

It’s a widely known password auditing tool that’s been around for 24 years.

I have been following programming and technology for decades and I had never heard of it.

Every project should have a concise (one or two sentence) description in the GitHub README and the website's homepage. Even the most well-known tools.

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#34
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks. Wonder why they can't put a description on the GitHub page?

Yeah, the repos don’t even have a useful README, at least to understand whatever the software does…

README.md should be renamed to BUILD.md; check under doc/ for a useful description.

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#35
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a widely known password auditing tool that’s been around for 24 years.

I have been following programming and technology for decades and I had never heard of it. Every project should have a concise (one or two sentence) description in the GitHub README and the website's homepage. Even the most well-known tools.

Only if you care about onboarding people not familiar with the industry (security in this case). This is not a given for many devs.

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#36
post #20

I wonder what the reasoning for open sourcing it now. And why not from the get go instead of decades later. Licence choices are obviously up to the authors. But at this point it is more a museum relic than anything practical

This is the reason:

> at this point it is more a museum relic than anything practical

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#37
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a widely known password auditing tool that’s been around for 24 years.

I have been following programming and technology for decades and I had never heard of it. Every project should have a concise (one or two sentence) description in the GitHub README and the website's homepage. Even the most well-known tools.

It's a cracking tool. If you never needed to crack NTLM passwords or bruteforce windows shared folder passwords over dialup, you might not have heard about it in the casual technology news.

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#38
post #4

Is it even really relevant anymore?

No. They seem to have been doing a few puff PR pieces recently. Can’t imagine anyone under 30 knows or cares about them. I guess their main claim to fame was being the first “hacker” group to do PR moderately well and transition into decent careers. Not really even an interesting footnote in history.

They testified in front of the U.S. Senate in 1998. That's more than a footnote might do, in my opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVJldn_MmMY

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#39
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a widely known password auditing tool that’s been around for 24 years.

I have been following programming and technology for decades and I had never heard of it. Every project should have a concise (one or two sentence) description in the GitHub README and the website's homepage. Even the most well-known tools.

Do you ever make it to DC or Blackhat? Not having to introduce/advertise who you are or what your tools do is part of the scene.

Re: L0phtCrack Is Now Open Source

#40

Nostalgia factor is kicking into high gear on this one, as I haven't thought of L0phtCrack since the early 2000s.

It's making me nostalgic for all of the old tools - what was another one, ``john''? Although that seems to have been modernised. https://www.openwall.com/john/
Post reply on HN