Live data from Hacker News

Francis Fukuyama’s Defense of Liberalism

persuasion.community

1–10 of 37 posts

Re: Francis Fukuyama’s Defense of Liberalism

#2
Fukuyama: Liberal societies are more innovative, wealthier.

Reality: It is very hard to argue America is as wealthy or innovative as it was, or as China is proving to be. In evaluating that assertion its important to note that absent production of desirable goods & services no country can maintain its wealth.

Fukuyama: Neoliberalism = hostility to the state.

Reality: Neoliberals lack faith in the individuals who makeup the state. They (I) mistrust their motivations, even if they first entered state service for the greater good. Careerism, self-dealing, cronyism & ideological bias runs rampant in the state. Smaller is safer.

Re: Francis Fukuyama’s Defense of Liberalism

#4

Fukuyama: Liberal societies are more innovative, wealthier. Reality: It is very hard to argue America is as wealthy or innovative as it was, or as China is proving to be. In evaluating that assertion its important to note that absent production of desirable goods & services no country can maintain its wealth. Fukuyama: Neoliberalism = hostility to the state. Reality: Neoliberals lack faith in the individuals who make…

[deleted]

Re: Francis Fukuyama’s Defense of Liberalism

#9

Fukuyama: Liberal societies are more innovative, wealthier. Reality: It is very hard to argue America is as wealthy or innovative as it was, or as China is proving to be. In evaluating that assertion its important to note that absent production of desirable goods & services no country can maintain its wealth. Fukuyama: Neoliberalism = hostility to the state. Reality: Neoliberals lack faith in the individuals who make…

> It is very hard to argue America is as wealthy or innovative as it was, or as China is proving to be.

The hard thing about it is agreeing on terms and providing data, but I don't think that's what you mean.

Re: Francis Fukuyama’s Defense of Liberalism

#10

sadly, his "end of history" thesis is turning out to be a replay of history that is the situation that preceded WWI, at an even more global scale. hopefully it doesn't replay the great war too

He’s done a lot of really good work since then. I recommend “Origins of Political Order.”

He really has some fascinating ideas.

Post reply on HN