Live data from Hacker News

IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

arstechnica.com

21–30 of 39 posts

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#21
post #5

Why would they? They are interested in reminding the workers who the boss is, who fires who for any reason, and who tells you what to put into your body if you want to put bread on your table. The shareholders should fire every single person who is pushing these policies, if they want to retain their best talent. Why are flight attendants being treated like pets or animals while some fat cat boss on an island somewhe…

Is this satire?

Nope. Shit just got real. Welcome to the turd '20s.

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#22
post #5

Why would they? They are interested in reminding the workers who the boss is, who fires who for any reason, and who tells you what to put into your body if you want to put bread on your table. The shareholders should fire every single person who is pushing these policies, if they want to retain their best talent. Why are flight attendants being treated like pets or animals while some fat cat boss on an island somewhe…

Is this satire?

.

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#23
post #17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you can do is expect to be in an environment where everyone is vaccinated to give you the best possible safety. Of course there is always a risk, virtually nothing in this world is a guarantee, that doesn't mean all risks are equal. The vaccine works, but it isn't 100%. Acting like that means we shouldn't bother is weird.

It’s not weird. Vaccine mandates for covid are demanding people make health decisions they haven’t bought into. It’s not like covid is polio. The risk models are different. I had covid, it was like a really bad flu. I got vaccinated because I wanted to travel, and the adenovirus vector didn’t seem that risky. Why would I push that choice on someone else given what I know first-hand of the disease?

> It’s not like covid is polio.

You're right, it's not like polio. In 1952, the worst polio outbreak in US history caused 3,145 deaths and 21,269 cases of paralysis (of varying levels) (ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_polio#Epidemics). In the last roughly-year-and-a-half, COVID-19 has caused 716,370 reported deaths (ref: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100k..., but it'll probably be higher by the time you check).

So COVID has been killing people at over 100x the rate of polio at its worst.

Also, polio didn't overload the capacity of the healthcare system the same way COVID keeps doing. This causes consequences for people without COVID who need access to healthcare.

>I had covid, it was like a really bad flu.

COVID has highly variable symptoms; taking your particular experience as typical is a mistake. In a lot of cases, COVID is asymptomatic. In another lot, it's roughly like yours. In a smaller, but still significant fraction, it's much more serious, involving hospitalization. (Also, something like half of symptomatic cases involve ongoing "long COVID" symptoms.) In an even smaller, but again still significant (see above) fraction, it's fatal.

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#24
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Vaccine mandates ignore the science by not recognizing people with naturally acquired immunity to Covid. 2. They ignore the science by not recognizing that the vaccinated also transmit Covid. 3. They are unjust because they do not recognize some people declined the second Covid shot after a bad reaction to the first and are therefore considered unvaccinated.

1) Why does that ignore the science? The evidence I see is that studies are ongoing but generally show no harm from vaccinating those people, and increased protection. If studies show otherwise, then policy makers should change the mandates, not an inherent issue with the core concept. 2) This point makes no sense. Yes, of course they can, but at hugely reduced rates. Something not being perfect doesn't mean it isn't…

1) Mostly agree, except the risk reward balance is slightly reversed the other way, even though both are small values. As such, it's true that it's more a question of principle than of medicine.

2) Not that reduced. Effectiveness is down to around 40-55% after a couple of months, as you can read in the latest peer-reviewed studies from last week in Nature [1], The Lancet[2] and by the ongoing statistic report of the Imperial College in London [3] on request of the UK govt. There are plenty others publications older by a month or three who show the same from the UK, France, China and Israel.

3) Whether you are in the UK, US, Israel, France, and a lot of other places, 93-97% of >50y.o. are already fully vaccinated. They are the most at risk. As for the current state of mandates, YMMV depending on where you live. To change them ?? You might have not noticed, but people requesting changes in the mandate are considered just shy of domestic terrorist plague rats of late...

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02689-y and the linked publication

[2] https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02183-8

[3] https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/90800

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#25
post #17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you can do is expect to be in an environment where everyone is vaccinated to give you the best possible safety. Of course there is always a risk, virtually nothing in this world is a guarantee, that doesn't mean all risks are equal. The vaccine works, but it isn't 100%. Acting like that means we shouldn't bother is weird.

It’s not weird. Vaccine mandates for covid are demanding people make health decisions they haven’t bought into. It’s not like covid is polio. The risk models are different. I had covid, it was like a really bad flu. I got vaccinated because I wanted to travel, and the adenovirus vector didn’t seem that risky. Why would I push that choice on someone else given what I know first-hand of the disease?

Because what you know first hand of the disease is useless for others. My 54 year old uncle had COVID. He was just in the hospital for 5 days and came back no different from before COVID. My 29 year old friend spent 2 weeks ventilated in ICU and dying of multi organ failure

The symptoms of COVID 19 are not always flu like. It is a spectrum of symptoms which is not yet understood why it expresses in different bodies differently.

During the Second wave in India a lot of my friends and acquaintances got it and their symptoms were all over the place. Some had diarrhea like symptoms, some had no visible symptoms at all, some simply lost the ability to smell and became physically weak.

Knowing this information, trying to be safe from COVID by catching it is no less than playing Russian roulette and it makes choosing to take a vaccine no brainer.

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#26
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I had covid, it was like a really bad flu This is not the only outcome of getting COVID-19.

What outcome should I be looking out for?

You had a ~3% chance of dying and a much larger chance of having lasting debilitating symptoms. Everyone you infected while having transmissible COVID faced the same odds. If you infected 100 people, it’s likely 3 people would die.

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#27
Governor could probably play hardball if he wants. Start fining them, seize their Texas real estate if they don't pay up.

Alternatively, order them to stop operating in Texas. If an airline breaks ranks, they'll enjoy a monopoly in the state and will be able to comfortably triple its ticket prices with no competition. Meanwhile the others will bleed like mad, scrambling to get their planes out and move their HQ.

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#28
Then why should other companies comply with mandates then? Isn't that the exact same line of thinking? People have clearly recovered, and are not forced to work if they don't want to. If they feel the job is unsafe, you can quit and find another one.

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#29
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I had covid, it was like a really bad flu This is not the only outcome of getting COVID-19.

What outcome should I be looking out for?

List of potentially permanent post COVID symptoms

* fatigue * memory problems sleep disturbances shortness of breath * anxiety and depression * general pain and discomfort difficulty thinking or concentrating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/201...

An example of an otherwise healthy person in excellent shape who is likely to have to face a career-ending post COVID life:

https://nationalpost.com/news/an-anti-vaxxer-edmonton-oiler-...

Re: IBM and airlines won’t comply with Texas governor’s ban on vaccine mandates

#30
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An employer that allows some employees to endanger others is negligent, most importantly in terms of ethics, but also in terms of productivity. Your right to swing your fist ends at my face. If you want to work with people, you have to take reasonable measures not to harm them. An employer that is willing to tell me to come in to work with people who refuse to get vaccinated is one that doesn't care about my well-bei…

1. Vaccine mandates ignore the science by not recognizing people with naturally acquired immunity to Covid. 2. They ignore the science by not recognizing that the vaccinated also transmit Covid. 3. They are unjust because they do not recognize some people declined the second Covid shot after a bad reaction to the first and are therefore considered unvaccinated.

1. Not true, my mother-in-law, who works in healthcare, caught COVID early during the pandemic, and received a positive test. The vaccine mandate recognizes that and her vaccine passport consider her adequately vaccinated with a single dose.

https://www.quebec.ca/en/health/health-issues/a-z/2019-coron...

"you received a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, or Covishield) at least 21 days after contracting COVID-19 (confirmed by a nucleic acid amplification test) and it has been at least 7 days since you received this dose;"

2. The jury is still arguing this one, but another aspect is that the more people who gets vaccinated, the lesser they risk going into the ICU and overloading the healthcare system.

3. There's a reason why they ask you to stay after getting the vaccine, to take you in charge of a medical emergency in case of an adverse reaction. That applies with any other vaccine, and if the first reaction is severe enough (according to a professional), they'll receive a proper exemption.

Post reply on HN