Isn't that the same organization that has been claiming to bring RISUG to the US for the last 10 years with ZERO results? I'm starting to think they're actually a shill claiming to tackle this issue so that nobody else will. Their goal seem to be the opposite of what they say.
COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
11–20 of 71 posts
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#12Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#13I'd love to have effective male contraception. But the previous work on this doesn't make it look like it's the answer: https://www.parsemus.org/humanhealth/ultrasound-male-contrac... See the section "Effective contraception in humans remains elusive"
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#14it's always a bad sign when the commercial slides and the nice 3D renders are ready before any scientific study of the device
Nevertheless, it's an interesting idea to speculate about. And it seems to be one of the more promising ideas in this area.
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#15In the past men used to take really warm baths to temporarily become infertile, i assume this uses the same process In related news: "coso" is used in italian to mean d.
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#16I see a couple of acceptance problems with the device. First, men a notoriously squeamish when it comes to their testicles. "Heating" without telling the temperature won't fly with many. I guess it doesn't have to be hot as it probably only needs to be warm enough to relax the cremaster muscles. If it has to be uncomfortably hot, I see little chance in the market. Second, I'd expect the ultrasound to hurt. The epidid…
> First, men a notoriously squeamish when it comes to their testicles. That's quite an inaccurate blanket statement. > Second, I'd expect the ultrasound to hurt. Ultrasound treatments are actually used to treat pain. Maybe you have evidence of ultrasounds causing pain, but I can't find anything of the sort. > Third, it will feel like gambling as the female partner doesn't really know whether all sperm is killed or wh…
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#17I see a couple of acceptance problems with the device. First, men a notoriously squeamish when it comes to their testicles. "Heating" without telling the temperature won't fly with many. I guess it doesn't have to be hot as it probably only needs to be warm enough to relax the cremaster muscles. If it has to be uncomfortably hot, I see little chance in the market. Second, I'd expect the ultrasound to hurt. The epidid…
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#18I see a couple of acceptance problems with the device. First, men a notoriously squeamish when it comes to their testicles. "Heating" without telling the temperature won't fly with many. I guess it doesn't have to be hot as it probably only needs to be warm enough to relax the cremaster muscles. If it has to be uncomfortably hot, I see little chance in the market. Second, I'd expect the ultrasound to hurt. The epidid…
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#19I wonder how long the effect lasts? How often would a man have to do this to maintain continuous contraception? Seems like there might be some long term effects from repeated ultrasonic treatment of any human tissue.
Re: COSO, an ultrasound-based and reversible approach to male contraception
#20I see a couple of acceptance problems with the device. First, men a notoriously squeamish when it comes to their testicles. "Heating" without telling the temperature won't fly with many. I guess it doesn't have to be hot as it probably only needs to be warm enough to relax the cremaster muscles. If it has to be uncomfortably hot, I see little chance in the market. Second, I'd expect the ultrasound to hurt. The epidid…
Even so, providing direct control of fertility by a male partner is an important problem. Currently, the only control option that permits unprotected sex is a vasectomy -- this is expensive, requires many months, and is not always reversible. On the female side there is the UID and hormonal interventions -- both of which have downsides for the female partner.