Live data from Hacker News

Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ triggered in a lab

imperial.ac.uk

1–10 of 494 posts

Re: Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ triggered in a lab

#3
Previously passim: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

(Edit: along with other, I now realise different, news from MIT.)

(Including my submission of this same link, not discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28219462, but the others are the same news.)

Discussed mostly in: ~~https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28462151 and:~~(edit, per above) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28219337

Re: Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ triggered in a lab

#4
post #3

Previously passim: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... (Edit: along with other, I now realise different, news from MIT.) (Including my submission of this same link, not discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28219462 , but the others are the same news.) Discussed mostly in: ~~ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28462151 and:~~(edit, per above) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i…

SPARC ≠ NIF

Re: Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ triggered in a lab

#7
post #2

Is this "plasma breakeven" or overall break-even?

From TFA:

"The pace of improvement in energy output has been rapid, suggesting we may soon reach more energy milestones, such as exceeding the energy input from the lasers used to kick-start the process."

Re: Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ triggered in a lab

#9
I thought ignition had been achieved a long time ago. Is the article saying this is the first time for this particular lab to achieve ignition, or have I confused my fusion hype-terminology? I genuinely can't tell, as the article is written in Hype rather than English...
Post reply on HN