Live data from Hacker News

Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

igorslab.de

31–40 of 182 posts

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#31
post #27

I’ve always thought of gaming as a virtuous low-impact form of entertainment, insofar as it displaces real-world pursuits like foreign ski holidays, gasoline-powered road trips, or land-hogging golf courses. But burning nearly a kilowatt on a gaming rig feels like a step too far. Sure, the power could be sourced from wind or solar plants, but there’s still a level of excessive conspicuous consumption going on here th…

Any human endeavor consumes energy.

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#33
post #27

I’ve always thought of gaming as a virtuous low-impact form of entertainment, insofar as it displaces real-world pursuits like foreign ski holidays, gasoline-powered road trips, or land-hogging golf courses. But burning nearly a kilowatt on a gaming rig feels like a step too far. Sure, the power could be sourced from wind or solar plants, but there’s still a level of excessive conspicuous consumption going on here th…

It's really low impact though. Even if your rig consumes a kW, you're still not driving anywhere (in a car that consumes at least an order of magnitude more), or going out to a restaurant (that's air conditioned), etc.

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, this is a tangent, but this kind of stuff irks me. Is there no love anymore for making things pretty enough but actually keeping things efficient? Do game devs (even AAA people) not like the family of things like 0x5F3759DF anymore? Efficiency aside, simply pushing the power requirements doesn't even bring home the bacon. Nintendo's "lateral thinking with withered technology" works super well, just look at the sw…

Gamedev is still full of clever people pushing graphics cards to their limits. The kinds of tricks are different nowadays, as most of the work is done on the GPU, and the important thing is to keep it busy with highly parallel, branchless code with good memory locality.

My point is being embarrassingly parallel over being efficient and smart isn't actually being clever, hence why the phrase is "embarrasingly parallel." That said, I often need get work done (publish papers) so I opt to do that over being more clever in my code.

I sort of looked up to gamedevs because they seem to accomplish a good experience without having to model everything, and its an attitude I've fantasized about bringing to my work. It sounds however like they are moving in our direction which is disappointing I guess.

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#35
post #27

I’ve always thought of gaming as a virtuous low-impact form of entertainment, insofar as it displaces real-world pursuits like foreign ski holidays, gasoline-powered road trips, or land-hogging golf courses. But burning nearly a kilowatt on a gaming rig feels like a step too far. Sure, the power could be sourced from wind or solar plants, but there’s still a level of excessive conspicuous consumption going on here th…

Lots of things are a huge waste of electricity. Ever use your oven? At 12% efficiency you're wasting over 1kw of electricity.

Unless energy prices rise, it's literally pennies.

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#36
post #27

I’ve always thought of gaming as a virtuous low-impact form of entertainment, insofar as it displaces real-world pursuits like foreign ski holidays, gasoline-powered road trips, or land-hogging golf courses. But burning nearly a kilowatt on a gaming rig feels like a step too far. Sure, the power could be sourced from wind or solar plants, but there’s still a level of excessive conspicuous consumption going on here th…

Rest assured that almost no gamer will have a card that uses that much power.

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#37
post #27

I’ve always thought of gaming as a virtuous low-impact form of entertainment, insofar as it displaces real-world pursuits like foreign ski holidays, gasoline-powered road trips, or land-hogging golf courses. But burning nearly a kilowatt on a gaming rig feels like a step too far. Sure, the power could be sourced from wind or solar plants, but there’s still a level of excessive conspicuous consumption going on here th…

Any human endeavor consumes energy.

Sex is good for 100 calories per minute. Google tells me thats a bit over 5 watts.

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#38
post #27

I’ve always thought of gaming as a virtuous low-impact form of entertainment, insofar as it displaces real-world pursuits like foreign ski holidays, gasoline-powered road trips, or land-hogging golf courses. But burning nearly a kilowatt on a gaming rig feels like a step too far. Sure, the power could be sourced from wind or solar plants, but there’s still a level of excessive conspicuous consumption going on here th…

Exactly why I decided to comment, only to find you already touched the topic :)

This is getting out of control!

Nvidia/AMD: build more efficient GPUs!

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#39
post #27

I’ve always thought of gaming as a virtuous low-impact form of entertainment, insofar as it displaces real-world pursuits like foreign ski holidays, gasoline-powered road trips, or land-hogging golf courses. But burning nearly a kilowatt on a gaming rig feels like a step too far. Sure, the power could be sourced from wind or solar plants, but there’s still a level of excessive conspicuous consumption going on here th…

Why? Your home heating consumes 5-50kW. In colder climates, the power consumption will be compensated by less home heating.

Re: Up to 600 watts of power for graphics cards with the new PCIe 5.0 powerconnector

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

600W worth of photogrammetry?

You ask a question, you get an answer and then you doubt the answer. That's not nice.

Its also an invitation to brag about their work! Its an incredible claim with a factual answer, its rare you get to show off about your niche like that right?
Post reply on HN