Live data from Hacker News

Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

developer.nvidia.com

61–70 of 100 posts

Re: Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

#62

Interesting that books3 and The Pile are among the largest corpus used for training - both with copyright concerns.

Do you want to be the reason we can't have nice things? Please don't post things like this.

They’re using and citing it, better than whatever GPT-3 did.

Re: Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

#63

Will anyone outside of Nvidia be able to access it? GPT-3 at least has an API.

(Team member of this project) Just a clarification, both Microsoft and Nvidia have ownership of this model. Here is the Microsoft version of same announcement.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/using-deepspee...

Re: Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

#65
post #54

Any idea if they’ll release an API similar to GPT-3? It’s great that larger and larger models are trained but without enabling access to the trained models developers are left out from the progress…

I hope they don’t release an API the way they released an API for GPT-3.

Why? What do you do not like about GPT-3 API?

Re: Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

#67
post #65
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hope they don’t release an API the way they released an API for GPT-3.

Why? What do you do not like about GPT-3 API?

Can't fine tune it. Can't use it on private data. Pay per symbol. High latency access. Inconsistent performance. No internet disconnected use. Can't guarentee repeatable results. Can't (easily) replace the sampling with alternatives that have different behavior (e.g. for using it for compression).

Re: Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

#68
post #25

What's really interesting is that these models are using some non-trivial portion of all easily accessible human writing -- yet humans learn language really well with significantly less input data. What's missing in the field to replicate human performance in learning?

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.10217.pdf

This is the paper I love to link in response to these sort of objections.

Re: Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

#69
post #9

Training data has 0.339T tokens, less than the number of training parameters. A model like that could store all of the training text with 100B+ parameters left for computation.

A single weight can’t encode an individual word, but the ratio looks close to overfitting too me too.

Re: Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, the World’s Largest Generative Language Model

#70
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's MoE.

Mixture of Experts, aka not all 10 trillion parameters are used at the same time, just a subset that is an "expert" on the "task at hand".

That would also describe an organic brain though.
Post reply on HN