I hope fanboys don't start defending Apple / Google for their privacy measures etc. (esp. Apple) Both platforms are notorious (Apple more so due to its closed nature imo) and defending any is just weird.
The difference is, with a good number of Android phones, you can just flash a custom rom without any tracking built in.
Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
131–140 of 155 posts
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#132Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#133Note that this study and the other one from earlier this year predate iOS 14.5, which introduced the “ask not to track” prompt that disables the operating system-provided unique identifier.
there has been a couple of studies demonstrating that basically is a useless feature, even worse, some apps track more when you "ask to not track". https://blog.lockdownprivacy.com/2021/09/22/study-effectiven...
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#134I'm not going to debate the conclusion of this paper, but keep in mind if you pick Android, it's still very important to pick the brand correctly. When you open the Clock app on Xiaomi phones, the first thing you see is a privacy policy you need to accept (!). Samsung might be better on this. I saw quite a few people on other websites (not HN) who said they switched to Android after Apple's CSAM thing, but put little…
Or use Pinephone if you want "actual" privacy. Librem 5 is an alternative as well, albeit an overpriced one.
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
> you can have the best of both worlds and own an Android phone and an i0S device If you truly need privacy and control then the right approach is to have neither of them and consider a GNU/Linux phone (Librem 5 or Pinephone).
That is if you not care about usability and security.
Usability suffers indeed, but the software updates will never end and it is improving rapidly.
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is if you not care about usability and security.
Security is in principle the same as in desktop Linux, which is not bad at all. See also: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque... Usability suffers indeed, but the software updates will never end and it is improving rapidly.
Even then, every program runs under your user account with no more fine-grained permissions, meaning any program has the ability to send your browser cache/ssh files/photos whatever to wherever it wants, or just simply encrypt them.
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Security is in principle the same as in desktop Linux, which is not bad at all. See also: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque... Usability suffers indeed, but the software updates will never end and it is improving rapidly.
Security of desktop Linux is unfortunately in the laughable category for the most part, with very few distro enforcing even the basics of SELinux/AppArmor. Even then, every program runs under your user account with no more fine-grained permissions, meaning any program has the ability to send your browser cache/ssh files/photos whatever to wherever it wants, or just simply encrypt them.
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Security of desktop Linux is unfortunately in the laughable category for the most part, with very few distro enforcing even the basics of SELinux/AppArmor. Even then, every program runs under your user account with no more fine-grained permissions, meaning any program has the ability to send your browser cache/ssh files/photos whatever to wherever it wants, or just simply encrypt them.
You are not wrong, but the security of Linux relies on FLOSS and community verification, which generally work better than the security of app stores, which are full of malware.
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#139One thing you have to consider when debating i0S versus Android in the context of privacy is: you can have the best of both worlds and own an Android phone and an i0S device (if you can afford that, and I'm aware many citizens in third world countries don't have the luxury of owning two phones). It's like the old Chrome versus Firefox debates that happen every other month now on Hackernews & Reddit. I own a Chromeboo…
> you can have the best of both worlds and own an Android phone and an i0S device This is something I’ve been wanting to do! I’d love to own an iPhone and Android so I can get the best of both worlds. Does anyone have any suggestions going this route? Ideally I’d like to keep a single number that can be used on both devices and I can just decide myself what device I want to drive for the day.
Re: Are iPhones Better for Privacy? Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nice, but that doesn't really address the plethora of other privacy/security concerns that Protonmail has server-side (like their IP logging which they claims never happened).
Please don't pollute the debate with incendiary inaccuracies. They said "by default, we do not keep any IP logs which can be linked to your anonymous email account." It's always been clear that if they were compelled to do so by law, they would have to comply and that's what happened.