Earlier quoted context omitted.
>OP is obviously talking about CEX Certainly -- I agree OP (arcticbull) was replying to a comment about DeFI by explaining the dangers of a centralized exchange! That makes it a confused, unhelpful response, not one that "obviously" meant something coherent if you squint hard enough and practice sufficiently strained exegesis. >As for DEXs being manipulated, absolutely not sure why you believe that’s the case? This h…
Btw, re: DEXs I was thinking specifically of flash loan manips that exploited a number of platforms a few months ago. These involved briefly breaking the peg of stable coins on DEXs via short-term loans. [1] I think it's brilliant. > One of the most notorious flash loan attacks to have ever hit the space is the exploit on DeFi protocol bZx, where the attackers borrowed funds from the platform and quickly swapped them…
Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
381–390 of 492 posts
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#382Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#383Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You can do it directly on FTX I’m no expert, but wouldn’t this be unrealizable? If tether were to fall it’s not crazy to think it would take with it most exchanges, given how most of them use USDT for maintaining operations.
This just isn't really the case any longer. Crypto has matured a lot in the last few years. And if you're still regurgitating the same FUD from 2016 you're in for a big surprise.
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#384Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do you think that? They treat USDT as any other coin, has no special status in the system. FTX is very well capitalized. Can you show me even napkin math that shows FTX going under if USDT blows up in a realistic scenario? (Going from $1 to $0 instantly isn't realistic.)
Why isn't going from $1 to $0 not realistic? Tether is completely centralized and has the ability to prevent token transfers on all major networks it operates on. They regularly add to their blacklist, much more often than other stablecoins. Were it seized by the DOJ, they could simply freeze all transfers subject to proof of AML/KYC and source of funds analysis. That would nuke the market for them immediately. I bel…
I'm very skeptical that FTX has 10B USDT on the balance sheet. OP here says Sam has billions of tether, which makes sense but is not enough to blow them up, and is likely in Alameda being as he says it's for trading, not in FTX.
(Of course it's possible that FTX has 10B in USDT deposits, but that belongs to their customers who would be very sad if it nuked but doesn't directly hurt FTX.)
Futures insurance fund may be an issue, yes, especially in scenarios where it shifts very rapidly. If you have math on a plausible scenario and total losses across the major markets I'd be interested in seeing it. But you'd have to be looking at several billion in losses or at over 1B directly attributable to FTX for them to go bust - they've raised over a billion and make 350M/year per recent Forbes article, so that's a lot of capital.
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#385Earlier quoted context omitted.
Keep in mind that the original Ponzi scheme ran for quite a while and even had the media defending it as a great investment. Tether (and most crypto) seems like someone copied Ponzi's original scheme 1:1. Put in some money, transfer it to another format (Tether to other crypto, with Ponzi it was stamps), then eventually pull out loads of cash. Some people will undeniably get rich off it. But it's not sustainable.
The part I have never seen elaborated on in the "Tether is a Ponzi" claims is at what point will people using Tether make money? Tethers are IOUs to facilitate moving USD between financial institutions (mainly between exchanges, and mostly used by the exchanges themselves). You can spend $1 USD to get 1 Tether that is "redeemable" (by trade, not through the Tether company) for exactly $1 USD. A Ponzi requires some ki…
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#386Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow ... I'm realizing what a completely unremarkable education and career I have. I've been a CTO twice but perhaps this shows what it would take to be a deputy CEO.
Well, I'll have you know I graduated summa cum laude from Lemönade Ständ Universität, which is a very prestigious institution in Luxemburg, when I was 6.
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#387Earlier quoted context omitted.
This just isn't really the case any longer. Crypto has matured a lot in the last few years. And if you're still regurgitating the same FUD from 2016 you're in for a big surprise.
FTX has received nearly 30% of the $48,000,000,000 in tethers that have been "minted" in the last year. You are telling me if tether fails they aren't going to be affected?
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#388Earlier quoted context omitted.
Btw, re: DEXs I was thinking specifically of flash loan manips that exploited a number of platforms a few months ago. These involved briefly breaking the peg of stable coins on DEXs via short-term loans. [1] I think it's brilliant. > One of the most notorious flash loan attacks to have ever hit the space is the exploit on DeFi protocol bZx, where the attackers borrowed funds from the platform and quickly swapped them…
The relevant question is whether the peg can be broken long enough for the loan to get margin called (by someone else exploiting the smartcontract to liquidate collateral). Lasting for the length of a flash loan isn’t enough.
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#389You can short Tether on FTX. You have to pay ~4% funding per year to short USDT-PERP. But if you think Tether collapses within 25 years its a good bet (probably going to come a lot sooner).
When you play by the rules against cheaters, you usually lose.
Re: Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?
#390Earlier quoted context omitted.
This just isn't really the case any longer. Crypto has matured a lot in the last few years. And if you're still regurgitating the same FUD from 2016 you're in for a big surprise.
> And if you're still regurgitating the same FUD from 2016 you're in for a big surprise. I’ve just given up on crypto at this point. I’m a big proponent in “invest in things you can understand”, and crypto is a space where very little people really understand what’s going. You can call that FUD if you want, but not acknowledging that crypto is a wild, wild west with a lot of shady corners, will set you up for a big r…