Number 19 is a clinker. Banach-Tarski applies only to objects in real-number space, but there are no such objects. For that to work, objects have to be infinitely divisible, but all of our objects are made out of atoms. Real-numbered space is a good enough approximation to our experience that we hardly ever encounter a model failure like this one.
Also this only works when the highly contested Axiom of Choice is used.
Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics
331–335 of 335 posts
Re: Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics
#332Earlier quoted context omitted.
The density of the sun is 1.4 g/cm^3, which is 1.4 times the density of the water. The atmosphere is 0.0012 g/cm^3 or three orders of magnitude less dense than the sun.
The density of the Sun isn't uniform of course, but according to this[0] StackExchange answer, the density of matter in the Sun already reaches that of air at about 95% of its radius. https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/32729/at-what-...
Re: Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics
#333Great list! > 33. "...if you flip fair coins to generate n-dimensional vectors (heads => 1, tails => -1) then the probability they're linearly independent is at least 1-(1/2 + o(n))^n. I.e., they're very very likely independent! Counterintuitive facts about high dimensional geometry could get their own list. A side-1 cube in n dimensions has volume 1 of course, but a diameter-1 sphere inside it has volume approaching…
Re: Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics
#334> 16. If you let a 100g strawberry that is 99% water by mass dehydrate such that the water now accounts for 98% of the total mass then its new mass is 50g: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potato_paradox I really like this one. It's a perfect combo of intuitive from one perspective and mind bending from another. > 18. A one-in-billion event will happen 8 times a month: https://gwern.net/Littlewood This one, on the other…
16 is like the money hall problem. I understand the answer, the answer makes sense to me. And yet but when I think of it how I think of it initially ... it still makes no sense.
Re: Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know, unless you do the calculation?
Don't know about you, but I have never seen any place that charges more for one large pizza than for two medium pizzas.