Because Tesla effectively doesn't have AEB while AutoPilot is enabled. In a Tesla AEB should be an entirely self-contained ("dumber") system. Its only job should be to look for any ground-level object ahead and brake. It should do this using simpler but more reliable ("dumber") techniques like forward bumper-level radar or camera parallax, not NN/deep learning/object recognition/AI. To use an analogy, AEB should be l…
Does Tesla even have a radar?
Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
71–80 of 147 posts
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, if the computer can recognize the situation it can always slow down, alert the driver, and eventually stop. That's the nice thing about cars: There's always a safe default mode. I suspect that the computer cannot recognize this problem reliably, though.
Slowing down to under 40mph is not a safe thing to do on a highway and is illegal in many places. And suddenly slowing down is extra unsafe when there's a car right behind you that's also being blinded.
Spoken like a true Tesla engineer.
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#73Because Tesla effectively doesn't have AEB while AutoPilot is enabled. In a Tesla AEB should be an entirely self-contained ("dumber") system. Its only job should be to look for any ground-level object ahead and brake. It should do this using simpler but more reliable ("dumber") techniques like forward bumper-level radar or camera parallax, not NN/deep learning/object recognition/AI. To use an analogy, AEB should be l…
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#74It always bugs me they trot out the Mountain View crash as an example where a Model X struck an unmarked and unprotected jersey barrier end in what visually looks like a traffic lane. Further that multiple human drivers had hit the divider in the same spot and a near fatal accident occurred literally the next day into the same barrier. If I put a brick wall on the freeway and paint it to look like a tunnel ala wil-e-…
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Slowing down to under 40mph is not a safe thing to do on a highway and is illegal in many places. And suddenly slowing down is extra unsafe when there's a car right behind you that's also being blinded.
Slowing down on a highway is required by law in many areas, in the presence of emergency vehicles.
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#76I read in another HN thread, that some Tesla owners have experienced "ghost braking," and have adopted the technique of holding their foot just above the accelerator, in order to counteract it. When I read that, I made a mental note to slow down a bit if a Tesla gets behind me, so they will pass me. Usually that's not a problem, as I don't drive particularly fast. I don't know if this is an issue with other brands of…
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Slowing down to under 40mph is not a safe thing to do on a highway and is illegal in many places. And suddenly slowing down is extra unsafe when there's a car right behind you that's also being blinded.
So just keep on trucking along at full speed with your eyes closed, you reckon. Spoken like a true Tesla engineer.
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#78Because Tesla effectively doesn't have AEB while AutoPilot is enabled. In a Tesla AEB should be an entirely self-contained ("dumber") system. Its only job should be to look for any ground-level object ahead and brake. It should do this using simpler but more reliable ("dumber") techniques like forward bumper-level radar or camera parallax, not NN/deep learning/object recognition/AI. To use an analogy, AEB should be l…
The Level 3 automation systems that Tesla and Uber built rely on two factors too, but they invert them, expecting disengaged humans to snap to alertness at super-human speed, which is just not how our brains work. So of course the second factor only exists as a legal cover to reduce their liability, which is all these players care about as far as safety is concerned.
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, your hypothesis makes no sense. There are WAY more cars sold by other brands, so more Tesla incidents is even more galling. Using autopilot should only HELP the auto braking not make it worse. Other systems use radar and camera. They are thoroughly tested by the OEMs and suppliers to strict tolerances. Meanwhile Tesla is shipping beta software and having people test it. Including removing radar because of “pha…
OPs point was tesla drivers are more likely to use the features. More cars being sold by other brands, could refute that but it doesnt necessarily. Its about the rate of usage of the software X total sales X avg. miles driven
Re: Why didn’t auto-braking stop these crashes?
#80Automatic braking doesn't get much attention, but it seems like something that could be incredibly valuable if it got to the "clearly better than human" level. This is purely anecdotal, but I find the automatic braking system on my Mazda CX-9 to be fairly annoying. Once every couple months or so, it has a false alarm and brakes while blaring out alerts, in an urban environment where I don't observe anything out of th…
I’ve had one instance where it went straight to braking - I took a right turn at low speed onto a neighborhood street and encountered a cyclist in my lane coming quickly and directly towards me, about 20 feet away. The car stopped itself. It was jarring but I wouldn’t say it was an overreaction.
I can only think of 1-2 cases where it’s truly given a false alarm - both at low speed on a city street with thick steam coming from a manhole in front of me, which Subaru says in the manual is a difficult situation. Both times I only got a momentary audible alarm; tap the brakes and it stops.
The reliability of AEB definitely varies by manufacturer, but I’m impressed by it.