Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That's absurd. There is no scientific basis that would support your assertion. Why are you so confident in that? Have you done your research? I learned that from a licensed psychologist, and know several people who have had severely negative reactions to "mindfulness" training, but it only took 30 seconds to find these two links: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210202-how-mindfulnes... https://www.newscienti…
Is there any evidence that therapy is helpful? Haven't seen any evidence supporting it but I might not be searching correctly.
Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
251–260 of 274 posts
Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#252Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
If quitting facebook is framed as impossible, then those who want to quit will feel helpless. Posts like the one above are helpful because they tell people that there is hope. You can quit facebook. Should we tell alcoholics that they'll never quit and their plight is hopeless? Or do we amplify the voices of those who succeeded in quitting, in the hopes that others may find inspiration to do the same? I'll do the lat…
I grew up in "Small Town America" in a large family and was really one of the "few" to ever move away (if any). The "problem" for me is that there really isn't an alternative to Facebook for sharing pictures and videos of my son and family for my close family to be a part of. I could have a personal blog, gallery, etc, but my grandparents that are on facebook (my son's great grandparents) don't get to see how much al…
I seem to manage; I use email and a website. These technologies have been working fine since around 1996.
The only "social media" account I've ever had is this one; and I'm pretty new here.
Consider teaching your rels to use straightforward technology that's been around for forty years (maybe since before they were born).
There's nothing special about Faceache; it's just a website with a messaging service (and an "app"). The only thing going for it is people who continue to use it, because they have "friends" who want to live in a Faceache bubble.
Look, that's cool; if you and your friends and rels think it's a good service, then you don't need any "alternative". I'm not going to beat you up for relying on Faceache.
But your ongoing use of Faceache, which you explain in terms of network effects ("but my grandparents that are on facebook") makes you part of the problem you yourself are complaining about.
Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but I actually rarely visit HN’s homepage, I really like the HN front-page, it gives me a sensation of comfort (so to speak), of how the Internet should have been but unfortunately it is not: very fast-loading page, all text, a basic color-scheme that hasn't changed in a while.
HN is what SlashDot was 15-20 years ago.
Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has the same energy as the cigarette lobbyist in congress who talked about how smoking lettuce has the same health effects as smoking tobacco
This comment makes absolutely no sense. It looks like you are just seeking to associate me with something you consider bad (e.g. tobacco lobbyists) by something like "tobacco lobbyists are arguing they are right, this guy argues he's right, therefore clearly they are the same". Could you address the content of my argument instead?
Similarly, your comment is trying to exonerate Facebook by comparing addictive Facebook use to... regular, "addictive" participation in healthy, fun physical activities? Despite the fact that it is a completely different situation: Facebook deliberately tries to be addictive, there are numerous studies about the negative effects of excess Facebook use, there are no physical health benefits, etc.
So I was just saying that your argument is as specious and nonsequitur as the tobacco lobbyist.
Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but I actually rarely visit HN’s homepage, I really like the HN front-page, it gives me a sensation of comfort (so to speak), of how the Internet should have been but unfortunately it is not: very fast-loading page, all text, a basic color-scheme that hasn't changed in a while.
HN is what SlashDot was 15-20 years ago.
Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#257Earlier quoted context omitted.
HN is what SlashDot was 15-20 years ago.
I still cannot really recapitulate what made me leave, but tech journalism in general became quite insufferable. It all read like scam and advertising at some point. It went from "stuff that matters" to something else.
Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#258Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#259Are they taking about the same Facebook? I find it utterly boring and only use it for messenger anymore. It used to be addictive, before social media, when it was a social network. You were interacting with real people, you could meet new people, "stalk" people you know IRL, share stuff about yourself or find out stuff about others. You would try to find your crush on FB and check see if you have common acquaintances…
I don't see how people enjoy it anymore. Guess they like all the doom scrolling.
Re: Facebook is an addiction treadmill most may never be able to quit
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
I still cannot really recapitulate what made me leave, but tech journalism in general became quite insufferable. It all read like scam and advertising at some point. It went from "stuff that matters" to something else.
True. But the comments and community is what i meant, too.