Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin is a Ponzi

ic.unicamp.br

541–550 of 684 posts

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#541
post #410

In a Ponzi scheme, a fraudulent perpetrator takes your money (and the money of many others), gives some of that to early dropouts but takes the rest for himself . Ponzi schemers profit from lying to you where your money goes. With a decentralized digital asset there is no sole person or company that profits from just lying to you about where your Dollar goes in exchange for digitals. Sure, miners and exchanges make p…

> They do not pretend making your money work for you by some magical scheme. No. They instead take your money, buy coal, and burn it. Nothing is left. As you say, Ponzi schemers take money for themselves and keep it. Most of what Madoff stole was recovered, for instance. Whereas virtually 100% of all money invested into crypto has been burned by miners. This is pretty easy to model. So there’s nothing left to recover…

> Whereas virtually 100% of all money invested into crypto has been burned by miners. This is pretty easy to model.

People like Bitcoin's provable global ledger and this is where the value lies. The value is not burned, it's embedded into this ledger.

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#543

In a Ponzi scheme, a fraudulent perpetrator takes your money (and the money of many others), gives some of that to early dropouts but takes the rest for himself . Ponzi schemers profit from lying to you where your money goes. With a decentralized digital asset there is no sole person or company that profits from just lying to you about where your Dollar goes in exchange for digitals. Sure, miners and exchanges make p…

You do realise digital assets have to be created right?

Your entire statement is wrong. I'm surprised you managed to write so much without realising how wrong it is.

Sounds like you don't know what digital assets are, or what a ponzi scheme is.

Trading cards are ponzi schemes too. From an entertainment point of view, they are created for the purpose of being fun to trade. From a monetary point of view, they are a ponzi scheme.

Bitcoin is neither fun, nor solves a problem, nor has any use beyond monetary.

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#544

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does it really make sense to hold USD if your only goal is liquidity? Maybe if you need it immediately , but honestly stocks and some other investments can usually be sold with the money accessible in seconds (or you can use credit). Really what I feel the value prop is for cash is low volatility (aka security as you mentioned). With low inflation like we have seen in the past, risk adjusted it might be a better spot…

I don't think you can sell traditional investments like stocks in seconds unless it is within designated trading hours. Crypto you can trade 24/7, although fiat wires out to traditional bank accounts still operate within certain hours (at least in the US, maybe this is different elsewhere). I still hold a small amount of my portfolio in USD, even considering inflation, but this is because it's less volatile than cryp…

Stablecoins have counter-party risk. USDT is run by folks under investigation by the DOJ for bank fraud and was at various times not actually backed (sometimes by anything). And the scuttlebutt is USDC is currently under investigation by the SEC. [1]

[1] https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/public-filing-from-crypto-...

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#545

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think you can sell traditional investments like stocks in seconds unless it is within designated trading hours. Crypto you can trade 24/7, although fiat wires out to traditional bank accounts still operate within certain hours (at least in the US, maybe this is different elsewhere). I still hold a small amount of my portfolio in USD, even considering inflation, but this is because it's less volatile than cryp…

Stablecoins have counter-party risk. USDT is run by folks under investigation by the DOJ for bank fraud and was at various times not actually backed (sometimes by anything). And the scuttlebutt is USDC is currently under investigation by the SEC. [1] [1] https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/public-filing-from-crypto-...

I agree. I intentionally don't hold stablecoins. As I mentioned I'd rather hold actual cash. One nice thing about stablecoins is they can be transferred around the world 24/7, and there are various high APRs for lending out stablecoins (not without risk, of course, there's nothing like FDIC insurance on those). Anyway, I'm surprised how much trust the crypto community puts in Tether.

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#547
post #483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No. They instead take your money, buy coal, and burn it. Nothing is left. Interesting, I never thought of it that way, and it makes sense. Since money is not created or destroyed the balance sheet on inflows and outflows of BTC to dollars must be zero at all times. And some x% (which is variable) of it is transferred to miners which is the so-called "transaction" cost. I guess there must be a point at which the bub…

If you're so certain short it. The amount of wealth you would gain by being correct is immense. You should be spending every waking moment attempting to predict it. Something about anti btcers I don't get you'll wax how smart you are and how everyone else is dumb. Just put your money where your mouth is.

[deleted]

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#548
Ponzi implies fraud.

Bitcoin, by definition, can't be fraud. The protocol and code are open source. We know how it works.

If you lose money because it's a speculative bubble that eventually pops, that's because you made a bad bet, not because you were defrauded.

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#549
post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I loathe Bitcoin, but that’s vastly wrong. As one counter-example, the Syrian civil war didn’t only displace poor people who never had anything to begin with; it displaced a lot of middle class families, made of engineers and doctors and such, who did have assets to their name but that were almost certainly incapable of taking it out of the country with them. It remains to be seen whether it would have been practical…

It is unfortunately quite factual that the vast majority of refugees worldwide functionally have no assets and often end up in debt at the end of their journey from home. Anecdotes of relative handfuls of affluent migrants are hardly compelling vis a vis the utility of e.g. BTC, especially given the lofty claims being made.

Outside of whether it would be feasible to move wealth to bitcoin before fleeing, discounting the existence of people who weren't miserable before they had to flee their decent existence due to war is insulting. You insinuated that all people who flee their country were resourceless before their displacement. Confronted with the fact that they aren't, you thought to save your point by declaring them "anecdotal". Not classy.

Re: Bitcoin is a Ponzi

#550

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> . If you try to maintain a $20k balance for a year, for example, you’ll discover that this balance counts against your deductions for that tax year (effectively a negative $20k deduction). Or at least that’s my understanding so far. You don’t get taxed on having a balance; you do get taxed on the income that generated it. (Or am I missing something crazy?)

My notes so far: https://shawwn.notion.site/Business-Taxes-e9f602855f524618b0... In one of these links, I am quite certain I saw words to the effect of "if you maintain a balance in the business, then the following tax year, it will count as a negative deduction for the shareholders (i.e. you), because the business type is a pass-through entity, and pass-through entities are expected to pass all of their income throu…

> Because yes, it does sound pretty ridiculous that an LLC needs to maintain a $0 balance or else it will penalize the owners of said LLC. That doesn't sound right.

It's definitely not correct at all. Neither is issuing phantom invoices to yourself to put money into the account.

A bank account is just a vehicle to store business cash, it really has nothing directly to do with the way you should be maintaining your LLC's books. You should be recording things like that as "capital contributions" which increase your "capital account."

Similarly, profits and losses should be booked to your capital account. I would strongly recommend doing some reading on capital account bookkeeping.

Post reply on HN