I have considered the owners and maintainers of Firefox to be malicious to the project for quite some time now. This finally cements that theory beyond any reasonable doubt. What should we do about it?
Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
21–30 of 115 posts
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#22Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#23> while keeping your privacy in mind.
Doesn't mean it's maintained with reasonable assurance.
Who is even asking for these features? The majority of firefox users I know are very privacy conscious. Is a little address bar feature really going to attract more people to use firefox?
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#24For revenue they should sell naming rights to their release versions like stadium naming rights. The name will also be in the executable "Firefox: vX.X TikTok"
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#25Safari is the best browser there is right now, hands down.
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#26Now, I don't particularly enjoy the idea of being tracked, but I don't really have activity that I wouldn't want a stranger (or a close friend, for that matter) to know about, anyway, and that's intentional.
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#27Safari is the best browser there is right now, hands down.
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#28I will miss your little furry logo henceforth.
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Advertising is fundamentally malicious.
Using stuff for free is also fundamentally malicious.
I have a fundamental right to see not see the content I do not want to see. I have a fundamental right to not be advertised to. Firefox has violated this right.
Re: Firefox Suggest (address bar based ads, currently limited to US)
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What should we do about it? Fork it. But I'm not sure I agree this is malicious. Perhaps annoying and even poorly thought out, but malicious implies they are actively trying to undermine the project, rather than trying to find ways to break the project's dependence on Google but missing the mark.
Fork it, and form a publicly-funded non-profit to continue development for the public good.