Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Let me tell you from personal experience, these people are doing more harm to their children than good." The problem is that the science clearly says the opposite: "At the end of 14 months, core ADHD symptoms were reduced more in the children treated with stimulants than with behavioral therapy. However, at the end of three years, 'medication use was a significant marker not of beneficial outcome, but of deteriorati…
I don't have time for a full rebuttal, and it may well be true that medication is a worse approach to ADHD treatment than behavioral therapy. However, I want to point out by example that science is not true that "science clearly says" this. --- 1. "At the end of 14 months, core ADHD symptoms were reduced more in the children treated with stimulants than with behavioral therapy. However, at the end of three years, 'me…
"It would be incorrect to conclude from these results that treatment makes no difference or is not worth pursuing"
They are defining treatment as either medication or therapy, not just medication.
"medication management-may only make a persistent long term difference if it is continued with the same intensity as during the MTA's initial 14 month period"
OK, but this is completely speculative. The researchers don't even give any reason to believe that this would be true, let alone point to any evidence.
"It could be that ADHD symptoms are positively correlated with psychosis."
The research states that all of the kids who developed psychosis were on ADHD meds, the group that was diagnosed with ADHD but was not medicated did not develop any psychosis at all.
"there is no indication that stimulant medication is wholly poor performing and that early studies indicating efficacy were flawed."
There were no early long-term studies indicating efficacy though, these are the only studies that were ever done.