Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 93

mozilla.org

191–200 of 235 posts

Re: Firefox 93

#191
post #17

Give me a way to pay for Firefox, please, and use the proceeds to hire a full development team that can hopefully catch up and overtake Chrome? Please?

Do you mean in market share or the actual product? Because I use Firefox daily and honestly feels less bloated and better to use than Chrome. I do use Chrome daily also, for some work-related apps

Re: Firefox 93

#192

Slightly off-topic but John Gruber has been writing about the new version of Safari[1] (and it's tabs and how they do or don't work) - and he linked back to some posts of his about Camino, which I'd forgotten about. Camino was the Gecko engine from Firefox in a "proper" Mac UI (unlike Firefox at the time, which was their cross-platform XUL UI). I used to use it as my primary browser and I really liked it. What killed…

IIRC the real nail in the coffin for Camino was the phasing out of support for embedded Gecko. (I was a Camino dev.)

Re: Firefox 93

#193
post #17

Give me a way to pay for Firefox, please, and use the proceeds to hire a full development team that can hopefully catch up and overtake Chrome? Please?

I have seen jobs at Mozilla that I'm interested in, but I'm just too afraid that they'll do more eng layoffs that I don't want to go through the hassle of applying.

Re: Firefox 93

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many charities will accept donations with restrictions (e.g. Only for program X, Only for Research, etc).

But they're not really enforceable because cash is fungible.

There are several legal precedents that say otherwise. Regardless, when you give money to a charity with a restriction or designation and they accept the money but ignore your request that generally doesn't go over well.

Re: Firefox 93

#195
I'd love to move to FF, but it has a virtual desktop bug dating back to 2007 [0], which is a showstopper for me.

When reopening FF, e.g., after restarting Win or Linux, all FF windows are restored to a single virtual desktop, even if they were on different desktops previously. Chromium-based browsers don't seem to have this problem.

They tried fixing it a few times [1,2], but the bug persists, and I am not aware of any add-ons that could serve as workarounds.

0. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372650 1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1401143 2. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=890125

Re: Firefox 93

#196
post #11

> Firefox now supports the new AVIF image format PARTY! I've been waiting for this for a long time. The last big hurdle for this was that color spaces weren't applied correctly. If you haven't taken a look at AVIF, do. You can get a similar looking image in AVIF at half the size as a JPEG. I find AVIF's image artifacts preferable to JPEG's.

Do you know when we can expect .heic?

I thought that .heic has patents on it and is thus not free in some cases. Which I think is an overwhelming reason to bury it and not use unless you have a very good reason to.

Having fewer browsers support .heic format would be a benefit -- as it would decrease the chances of the format surviving.

Re: Firefox 93

#197
post #77

Awesome, after reading through the first time contributions I can see my first albeit pretty minor patch is included in this release! Overall contributing has been very pleasant and the people on Mozilla's matrix channels have been helpful getting me on track. But better than taking my word for it, you should try contributing for yourself :)

Out of curiosity, what was your contribution?

Re: Firefox 93

#198

Slightly off-topic but John Gruber has been writing about the new version of Safari[1] (and it's tabs and how they do or don't work) - and he linked back to some posts of his about Camino, which I'd forgotten about. Camino was the Gecko engine from Firefox in a "proper" Mac UI (unlike Firefox at the time, which was their cross-platform XUL UI). I used to use it as my primary browser and I really liked it. What killed…

Gecko wasn't really designed or made for embedding. For years using it without XUL has continue to be a struggle. Mozilla dropped support for embedding Gecko so Camino had to switch to WebKit, and in the end it just wasn't worth the effort given Camino offer no advantage to Safari using the same engine.

Re: Firefox 93

#199
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mitchell Baker (Mozilla CEO) makes 3 million a year. It's actually very profitable for a nonprofit organization, isn't it? "On the same period, Firefox marketshare was down 85%. When asked about her salary she stated "I learned that my pay was about an 80% discount to market. Meaning that competitive roles elsewhere were paying about 5 times as much. That's too big a discount to ask people and their families to commi…

Tell us about the CEO previous to her.

Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in "what about…?") is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy, which attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving the argument.

Re: Firefox 93

#200
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

JPEG XL has a party trick where you can losslessly transcode JPEG files to JPEG XL for a ~20% size savings. I imagine that every CDN out there will enable transparent conversion of JPEG to JPEG XL and that will drive adoption just by itself.

Dropbox quietly replaces the insides of JPGs with a better compression system (lossless change) to save their storage costs, and then returns it to normal when the file is read. (It may be they do a JPEG XL transform, for all I can remember about the article which explained it). I wouldn't be too surprised if every big CDN already does something like that internally as a competitive advantage, and if so then the ince…

Aren't the biggest costs from bandwidth, not storage? I'm sure they would love to reduce data transmission by 20% for browsers that support it.
Post reply on HN